test: Benchmarks for record datetime parsing

[BuzzCutNorman]

Closes #2048

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://meltano-sdk--2054.org.readthedocs.build/en/2054/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f96df37) 87.46% compared to head (b5eb24e) 87.46%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2054   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.46%   87.46%           
=======================================
  Files          58       58           
  Lines        4867     4867           
  Branches      993      993           
=======================================
  Hits         4257     4257           
  Misses        429      429           
  Partials      181      181           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[BuzzCutNorman]

@edgarrmondragon I am not quite sure why test_validate_record is passing while test_bench_parse_timestamps_in_record and test_bench_validate_and_parse are failing. I would think all three would pass or fail the same way. When you have some time would you please review the codspeed errors.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2054 will not alter performance

_{Comparing BuzzCutNorman:2048-benchmarks-for-datetime-parsing (b5eb24e) with main (f96df37)}

Summary

✅ 1 untouched benchmarks

🆕 2 new benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	BuzzCutNorman:2048-benchmarks-for-datetime-parsing	Change
🆕	test_bench_parse_timestamps_in_record	N/A	25.2 s	N/A
🆕	test_bench_validate_and_parse	N/A	29.7 s	N/A

[edgarrmondragon]

Nice. Thanks a lot @BuzzCutNorman!