Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: move to automated checks #62

Merged
merged 76 commits into from
May 22, 2024
Merged

refactor: move to automated checks #62

merged 76 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

mds1
Copy link
Owner

@mds1 mds1 commented Apr 15, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
evm-diff ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 21, 2024 0:47am

return true; // Call succeeded so opcode is supported.
} catch (e: unknown) {
const err = e as CallError;
// TODO These might be specific to the node implementation, can this be more robust?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe each opcode has to have an accompanying test case that succeeds when executed?

It's extra work, but much more robust. Happy to help with that if you think it's a good idea.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree this is a good idea. I'm just about ready to merge this branch and hope to merge it early this week, so I've created #67 to track. Definitely would appreciate your help on this!

@mds1 mds1 marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 03:21
@mds1 mds1 merged commit 94f1492 into main May 22, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants