Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

solution #3901

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

solution #3901

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DmytroKrylov
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on the Pull Request! 🌟 You've addressed the core functionality well. Just a few minor suggestions: consider using a more efficient approach instead of shift to handle the state history, and try to give more descriptive names to your variables, like renaming newState to stateCopy. These changes can enhance the readability and performance of your code. Keep up the good work! 👍

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

@@ -7,7 +7,39 @@
* @return {Object[]}
*/
function transformStateWithClones(state, actions) {
// write code here
const stateHistory = [state];

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to the task description, the initial state object should not be modified. However, adding the initial state directly to the stateHistory array may lead to unintended mutations of the original state object if any modifications are made to the first element of the stateHistory array. Instead, you should add a copy of the initial state to the array.

const stateHistory = [state];

actions.forEach((action) => {
let newState;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[NAMING] - The variable newState should have a more descriptive name that indicates it is a copy of the state. Consider renaming it to stateCopy or similar to improve code readability.

}
stateHistory.push(newState);
});
stateHistory.shift();

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The use of shift at line 40 is unnecessary and potentially inefficient since it modifies the original array. Instead, you can initialize stateHistory as an empty array and then push state copies into it as you process actions. This way, you won't need to remove the initial state at the end.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants