Merge pull request #979 from makerdao/assorted-fixes

Assorted fixes

MIP113/MIP113.md

@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ The Advisory Council is paid on a project basis to do specific work that improve
 
 ##### 1.1.3.1
 
-Entities are encouraged to submit applications with the intention of enhancing a specific portion of the Scope Framework. Any entity can notice a problem in the Scope or something that can and should be improved and apply to undergo a process to suggest improvements. The Governance Facilitators should diligently encourage participants possessing relevant areas of expertise to actively engage in this process to the fullest extent possible. Accordingly, once this MIP is successfully passed, it is imperative that the Governance Facilitators promptly post a Request for Applicants to the forum within a period of 30 days. The Governance Facilitators may choose to utilize a Peer-to-Peer recruiting process, which involves allocating a portion of the Governance Advisory Council budget to incentivize ecosystem participants and community members to actively seek out applicants, providing comprehensive explanations of the process.
+Entities are encouraged to submit applications with the intention of enhancing a specific portion of the Scope Framework. Any entity that notices a problem in the Scope or something that can and should be improved can apply to undergo a process to suggest improvements. The Governance Facilitators should diligently encourage participants possessing relevant areas of expertise to actively engage in this process to the fullest extent possible. Accordingly, once this MIP is successfully passed, it is imperative that the Governance Facilitators promptly post a Request for Applicants to the forum within a period of 30 days. The Governance Facilitators may choose to utilize a Peer-to-Peer recruiting process, which involves allocating a portion of the Governance Advisory Council budget to incentivize ecosystem participants and community members to actively seek out applicants, providing comprehensive explanations of the process.
 
 ##### 1.1.3.2
 
@@ -376,34 +376,30 @@ The Governance Facilitators must monitor and record the status of each AVC.
 
 ##### 5.2.4.1
 
-The list of all AVCs is contained in *5.2.4.1A*, broken down by current status. The Arbitration Facilitators must keep the list current based on AVC creation, adherence with requirements, and AVC Decisions.
-
-##### 5.2.4.2
-
 An AVC is marked as _active_ status if it has fulfilled every requirement under *4.3* in the previous quarter.
 
 ---
-##### 5.2.4.3
+##### 5.2.4.2
 
 An AVC is marked as _inactive_ status if it has failed to fulfill the requirements under *4.3* for the most recent quarter, but has fulfilled the requirements for one or more prior quarters.
 
 ---
-##### 5.2.4.4
+##### 5.2.4.3
 
 An AVC is marked as _pending_ status if it has been in existence for less than one full quarter.
 
 ---
-##### 5.2.4.5
+##### 5.2.4.4
 
-An AVC that has failed to fulfill the requirements under *5.2.4* for two consecutive quarters is no longer considered an AVC and is removed from the list in *5.2.4.7.1A*.
+An AVC that has failed to fulfill the requirements under *5.2.4* for two consecutive quarters is no longer considered an AVC and is removed from the list in *5.2.4.6.1A*.
 
 ---
-##### 5.2.4.6
+##### 5.2.4.5
 
-The list of all AVCs is contained in *5.2.4.7.1A*, broken down by current status. The Arbitration Facilitators must keep the list current based on AVC creation, adherence with requirements, and AVC Decisions.
+The list of all AVCs is contained in *5.2.4.6.1A*, broken down by current status. The Arbitration Facilitators must keep the list current based on AVC creation, adherence with requirements, and AVC Decisions.
 
 ---
-##### 5.2.4.7.1A
+##### 5.2.4.6.1A
 
 ¤¤¤