Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development: Add simple repository service #9871

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

change test for ensuring single autowire in SimpleServices to allow f…

902a7ed
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Sign in for the full log view
Open

Development: Add simple repository service #9871

change test for ensuring single autowire in SimpleServices to allow f…
902a7ed
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
GitHub Actions / H2 Tests failed Dec 17, 2024 in 0s

8569 passed, 1 failed and 19 skipped

Tests failed
Report exceeded GitHub limit of 65535 bytes and has been trimmed

Annotations

Check failure on line 212 in src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / H2 Tests

de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest ► testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack()

Failed test found in:
  build/test-results/test/TEST-de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.xml
Error:
  org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
Raw output
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
expected: 2L
 but was: 1L
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.clientConnectToArtemisSshServer(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:212)
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:145)
	at [email protected]/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:387)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1312)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1843)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1808)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:188)