chore(robot): cleanup #2197
chore(robot): cleanup #2197
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on standardizing test case naming conventions across multiple Robot Framework test files in the Longhorn e2e testing suite. The changes primarily involve updating test case titles to use consistent title case capitalization, ensuring improved readability and uniformity. These modifications span several test files related to component resilience, node draining, backup listing, volume testing, and persistent volume claims. No functional changes to the underlying test logic were made, making this a purely cosmetic update to enhance documentation clarity. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
- Fix test case names to follow a consistent format. - Remove redundant spaces. Signed-off-by: Chin-Ya Huang <[email protected]>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
e2e/tests/negative/node_drain.robot (4)
Line range hint
1-90: Document the LOOP_COUNT variable purpose and valueThe test cases use
${LOOP_COUNT}for iteration, but its purpose and value are not documented. Consider adding documentation to explain why multiple iterations are needed and what value is used.
Line range hint
91-119: Add prerequisite verification for worker node countThe test documentation specifies a requirement for "3 worker nodes" but the test doesn't verify this prerequisite. Consider adding a verification step at the beginning of the test:
Given Verify minimum 3 worker nodes exist And Create storageclass longhorn-test with dataEngine=${DATA_ENGINE}
Line range hint
142-155: Resolve grace period inconsistency in documentationThe documentation shows
--grace-period=10but the actual command uses--grace-period=-1. Please update the documentation to match the actual implementation.Consider a more concise test case name
The current name "Test Kubectl Drain Nodes For PVC/PV/LHV Is Created Through Longhorn API" is verbose. Consider something more concise like "Drain Node With Longhorn API Created Volumes".
Line range hint
184-219: Fix typo in instance_manger parameter nameThere's a typo in the parameter name:
-And Check PDB not exist instance_manger=${instance_manager_name} +And Check PDB not exist instance_manager=${instance_manager_name}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
e2e/tests/negative/component_resilience.robot(8 hunks)e2e/tests/negative/node_drain.robot(4 hunks)e2e/tests/negative/pull_backup_from_another_longhorn.robot(3 hunks)e2e/tests/negative/replica_rebuilding.robot(2 hunks)e2e/tests/negative/test_backup_listing.robot(2 hunks)e2e/tests/regression/test_persistentvolumeclaim.robot(1 hunks)e2e/tests/regression/test_volume.robot(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- e2e/tests/regression/test_persistentvolumeclaim.robot
- e2e/tests/negative/pull_backup_from_another_longhorn.robot
- e2e/tests/negative/test_backup_listing.robot
- e2e/tests/negative/replica_rebuilding.robot
- e2e/tests/regression/test_volume.robot
- e2e/tests/negative/component_resilience.robot
🔇 Additional comments (2)
e2e/tests/negative/node_drain.robot (2)
Line range hint 120-141: LGTM! Well-structured test case with comprehensive verification
The test case effectively verifies node draining without force, including pod eviction, volume reattachment, and data integrity checks.
Line range hint 156-183: LGTM! Well-documented test with clear issue reference
The test case effectively verifies the behavior described in issue #2237, with comprehensive steps and clear verification points.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Issue
NoneWhat this PR does / why we need it:
Special notes for your reviewer:
NoneAdditional documentation or context
NoneSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style