Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update Dockerfile to SPDK longhorn-v24.09 branch #239

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

DamiaSan
Copy link
Contributor

Longhorn 9700

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Issue longhorn/longhorn#9700

What this PR does / why we need it:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation or context

@DamiaSan DamiaSan requested review from innobead, derekbit, c3y1huang, shuo-wu and a team November 15, 2024 14:56
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request primarily involve updating the SPDK_COMMIT_ID in the Dockerfile.dapper from an older commit to a newer one. This modification indicates a transition to a different version of the SPDK library, while all other environment variables and the overall structure and functionality of the Dockerfile remain unchanged. The installation commands and entry points for the container are preserved.

Changes

File Change Summary
Dockerfile.dapper Updated SPDK_COMMIT_ID from a6478cde7e0cff2fb09992868308a7387aa5202a to 10463b5c13b454e173707628b9eac608081f5082. Other environment variables unchanged.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update to upcoming 24.09 SPDK release (#9700)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • innobead

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 661a538 and b318dc7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile.dapper (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Dockerfile.dapper

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4642db1 and ec30fcf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile.dapper (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Dockerfile.dapper (2)

Line range hint 45-57: Verify SPDK build configuration for v24.09

The build configuration uses architecture-specific settings and disables several features. Please verify:

  1. If the new SPDK version requires any additional build flags
  2. If the architecture-specific settings (nehalem for amd64, native for arm64) are still optimal
  3. If the disabled features (tests, unit-tests, examples, nvme-cuse) are still intended to be disabled
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for build configuration changes in new SPDK version
# Expected: Build flags should be compatible with v24.09

# Clone and check configure script changes
cd /tmp
git clone https://github.com/longhorn/spdk.git
cd spdk
git checkout 10463b5c13b454e173707628b9eac608081f5082

# Check configure script help and defaults
./configure --help
grep -r "target-arch" .
grep -r "DPDKBUILD_FLAGS" .

# Clean up
cd /tmp
rm -rf spdk

Line range hint 17-20: Verify dependency compatibility with new SPDK version

Please ensure that the current versions of dependencies (libjson-c, nvme-cli, and go-spdk-helper) are compatible with the new SPDK version.

Dockerfile.dapper Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 8.43%. Comparing base (4a95c30) to head (b318dc7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main    #239      +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage   8.39%   8.43%   +0.04%     
========================================
  Files         21      21              
  Lines       7150    7150              
========================================
+ Hits         600     603       +3     
+ Misses      6470    6468       -2     
+ Partials      80      79       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 8.43% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@DamiaSan DamiaSan changed the title update to SPDK longhorn-v24.09 branch fix(deps): update Dockerfile to SPDK longhorn-v24.09 branch Nov 19, 2024
@derekbit derekbit merged commit ad968cf into longhorn:main Nov 19, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants