fofb_shaper_filt: implement module. #27
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ericonr
force-pushed
the
shaper-filt
branch
from
947b2f4
to
064e67f
Compare
|
@augustofg and @guilhermerc , please let me know when we know for sure what hardware configuration (which acq cores and channels) we are going with! |
ericonr
force-pushed
the
shaper-filt
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ce88290
to
96686a7
Compare
Omit parameter names instead of marking as maybe unused. The nElements parameter in readEnum is left, because the max number of enum elements should be used in a future version, for better error checking.
This way, the corrector names don't have to be duplicated in every relevant module's req file.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
ericonr
force-pushed
the
shaper-filt
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b9c0dfb
to
301efdf
Compare
This was only noticed due to an intermittent slowdown in the iocInit call in stTIM.cmd. This happened because asynEnumSyncIO.c's readOp() [1], called from devAsynInt32.c's initBi(), loops *nIn times calling the asynPrint macro. Uninitialized nIn could and did take arbitrary, sometimes large, values; a perf report even showed most of the iocInit time was spent in the getTraceMask() call of asynPrint. However, since tracing wasn't enabled at that level for the port, it never tried to print anything, and didn't trigger a segfault by accessing out-of-bounds memory. [1] https://github.com/epics-modules/asyn/blob/R4-44/asyn/interfaces/asynEnumSyncIO.c#L155
With the removal of the DCC core, there is a big change to the available channels.
The filter defined in fofb_shaper_filt has representation limits for its coefficients, so an external multiplier gain might be necessary to actually implement it in hardware. To avoid requiring an additional gain in the hardware and the resultant resource consumption, it was decided to use the FOFB accumulator gain implemented in hardware as the combination of FOFBAccGain and FOFBAccFilterGain. It is simpler to define the PV for it in fofb_processing, since it has to be combined with the FOFBAccGain for the FOFBAccHwGain that's applied to the hardware. The output for FOFBAccHwGain is a -RB because it shouldn't be written to, and is the configuration we tried to write to hardware. The input is a -Mon because its sole purpose is getting a feedback as to what's actually in hardware. In order to provide feedback on the applied gain's precision, the readback for the separate gains uses the gain that was actually applied to hardware divided by the other gain's setpoint. The slightly complex CALC definition for the gain readbacks is necessary for two reasons: the readback will be different from the setpoint if the resulting HwGain is outside of the hardware's representable range (this can also be verified with FOFBAccHwGain-Mon's value); and one of the gains being set to 0 shouldn't cause the readbacks to be NaN.
And add its PVs to autosave.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.