Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix images #336

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2025
Merged

fix images #336

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2025

Conversation

skull8888888
Copy link
Collaborator

@skull8888888 skull8888888 commented Jan 19, 2025

Important

Fixes image URL handling in ContentPartImageUrl by appending ?payloadType=image to relative paths.

  • Behavior:
    • In ContentPartImageUrl, appends ?payloadType=image to relative URLs to indicate S3 storage.
  • Misc:
    • Minor comment added to explain the URL handling logic in ContentPartImageUrl.

This description was created by Ellipsis for c96113e. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to c96113e in 28 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 16 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/components/traces/chat-message-list-tab.tsx:37
  • Draft comment:
    Avoid modifying the url parameter directly. Instead, create a new variable for the modified URL to prevent potential side effects.
  const modifiedUrl = url.startsWith('/') ? `${url}?payloadType=image` : url;
  return <img src={modifiedUrl} alt="span image" />;
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
    While modifying function parameters directly is generally not best practice, in this case: 1) The modification is very simple and contained 2) It's a local component parameter 3) The url is only used once after modification 4) There are no complex operations or potential for bugs 5) Creating a new variable would add unnecessary verbosity
    The comment does point out a real code style issue - mutating parameters is generally discouraged. There could be future modifications that make this more problematic.
    Given the simplicity and locality of this code, the benefit of creating a new variable is outweighed by the added verbosity. The current code is clear and maintainable.
    This comment should be deleted as it suggests a change that would make the code more verbose without providing meaningful benefits in this specific case.

Workflow ID: wflow_1Ef7IAMUbixBUz3J


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@skull8888888 skull8888888 merged commit f9f443f into dev Jan 19, 2025
2 checks passed
@skull8888888 skull8888888 deleted the fix/images branch January 19, 2025 22:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant