Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add todo note to cover Jasmin #216

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kbeyls
Copy link
Member

@kbeyls kbeyls commented Nov 4, 2023

Hi @swarnpriya!
This PR adds a sidenote to cover #213 which you raised.
I intend to merge this in the coming days.
Just want to give you a heads up and an opportunity to review this before I merge it.
Thanks again for sharing your feedback by creating issues!


This change is Reviewable

Copy link

@swarnpriya swarnpriya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, a good idea to add this paper's link: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3548606.3560689
(It covers how the Jasmin compiler preserves fine-grained constant-time policies like time-variable instructions and cache-line conflicts).

@kbeyls
Copy link
Member Author

kbeyls commented Nov 6, 2023

Also, a good idea to add this paper's link: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3548606.3560689 (It covers how the Jasmin compiler preserves fine-grained constant-time policies like time-variable instructions and cache-line conflicts).

Thanks, I've updated this PR accordingly.

@kbeyls kbeyls merged commit 690e134 into llsoftsec:main Jan 10, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants