rework #![no_std] support, switch on alloc (#236)
#42
lloydmetaAnnotations
1 error and 10 warnings
|
benchmark
# :warning: **Performance Alert** :warning:
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark **'Frunk Benchmarks'**.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold `2`.
| Benchmark suite | Current: 93c4db74fac719764e3ce841f5169550efd1bb60 | Previous: 1ca9c995b966ef204accd6b992401acfec302500 | Ratio |
|-|-|-|-|
| `empty` | `0.31` ns/iter (`± 0.00`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `generic_conversion` | `0.77` ns/iter (`± 0.01`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `hlist_into_hlist_pat_match` | `0.77` ns/iter (`± 0.13`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `hlist_into_tuple2_match` | `0.77` ns/iter (`± 0.01`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `labelled_conversion` | `0.77` ns/iter (`± 0.67`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `name` | `0.31` ns/iter (`± 0.00`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `sculpted_conversion` | `0.77` ns/iter (`± 0.01`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `lens_path_read_mut` | `0.31` ns/iter (`± 0.01`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `lens_path_read_ref` | `0.31` ns/iter (`± 0.01`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `lens_path_read_value` | `0.31` ns/iter (`± 0.00`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `normal_path_read_mut` | `0.31` ns/iter (`± 0.00`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `normal_path_read_ref` | `0.31` ns/iter (`± 0.00`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `normal_path_read_value` | `0.31` ns/iter (`± 0.00`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
| `std_add_i32` | `0.31` ns/iter (`± 0.00`) | `0` ns/iter (`± 0`) | `+∞` |
This comment was automatically generated by [workflow](https://github.com/lloydmeta/frunk/actions?query=workflow%3ABenchmarks) using [github-action-benchmark](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/continuous-benchmark).
CC: @lloydmeta
Comment was generated at https://github.com/lloydmeta/frunk/commit/93c4db74fac719764e3ce841f5169550efd1bb60#commitcomment-146059625
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.31. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.77. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.77. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.77. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.77. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.31. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.77. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.31. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.31. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
benchmark
Performance alert! Previous value was 0 and current value is 0.31. It is Infinityx worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|