Add support for JUMP_LABEL batch-mode feature for ARM64 #352
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ARM64 added support for JUMP_LABEL batch-mode feature. This commit adds support for it and addresses lkrg-org#351
solardiz
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2024
|
I'm OK merging this, but I suggest we discuss a bit more on #351 next. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ARM64 added support for JUMP_LABEL batch-mode feature. This commit adds support for it and addresses #351
How Has This Been Tested?
Run it under Raspberry Pi 4 (under ALT Linux - thanks to @vt-alt ). I run it for couple of hours under the following condition:
screen 1: run the command
while true; do echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/enable && echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/enable; donewhich enforces JUMP_LABEL batch modescreen 2: run the command
while true; do sysctl lkrg.trigger=1; sleep 1; doneto enforce integrity validation.More comprehensive tests are probably needed. However, it seems like that current logic works (at least for now).