-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[server][controller] Try ungraceful close when the graceful one faile… #828
Merged
lluwm
merged 3 commits into
linkedin:main
from
lluwm:try_nongraceful_close_when_graceful_fail
Jan 26, 2024
Merged
[server][controller] Try ungraceful close when the graceful one faile… #828
lluwm
merged 3 commits into
linkedin:main
from
lluwm:try_nongraceful_close_when_graceful_fail
Jan 26, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…d in VeniceWriter In VeniceWriter.close(), when gracefulClose is set to true, Kafka producer call the underlining method, which tries to flush the buffered data before closing it (see ApacheKafkaProducerAdapter.close). However, when exception happens (e.g. timeout), today, VeniveWriter only logs the exception, moves on, and consider the VeniceWriter being closed while it is actually not. (A leaking venicewriter can cause several issues, e.g. a stuck consumer thread etc.) This change adds a retry of ungraceful close if gracefulClose flag is set to true and it failed. In this case, ungraceful close will skip the flushing step and it should always succeed (e.g. StoreIngestionTask.kill()). For cases where gracefulClose is set to false, this change doesn't change anything.
gaojieliu
reviewed
Jan 23, 2024
internal/venice-common/src/main/java/com/linkedin/venice/writer/VeniceWriter.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gaojieliu
reviewed
Jan 24, 2024
internal/venice-common/src/main/java/com/linkedin/venice/writer/VeniceWriter.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/venice-common/src/main/java/com/linkedin/venice/writer/VeniceWriter.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/venice-common/src/main/java/com/linkedin/venice/writer/VeniceWriter.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/writer/VeniceWriterUnitTest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gaojieliu
approved these changes
Jan 25, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
lluwm
added a commit
to lluwm/venice
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
linkedin#828) * [server][controller] Try ungraceful close when the graceful one failed in VeniceWriter In VeniceWriter.close(), when gracefulClose is set to true, Kafka producer call the underlining method, which tries to flush the buffered data before closing it (see ApacheKafkaProducerAdapter.close). However, when exception happens (e.g. timeout), today, VeniveWriter only logs the exception, moves on, and consider the VeniceWriter being closed while it is actually not. (A leaking venicewriter can cause several issues, e.g. a stuck consumer thread etc.) This change adds a retry of ungraceful close if gracefulClose flag is set to true and it failed. In this case, ungraceful close will skip the flushing step and it should always succeed (e.g. StoreIngestionTask.kill()). For cases where gracefulClose is set to false, this change doesn't change anything.
lluwm
added a commit
to lluwm/venice
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
linkedin#828) * [server][controller] Try ungraceful close when the graceful one failed in VeniceWriter In VeniceWriter.close(), when gracefulClose is set to true, Kafka producer call the underlining method, which tries to flush the buffered data before closing it (see ApacheKafkaProducerAdapter.close). However, when exception happens (e.g. timeout), today, VeniveWriter only logs the exception, moves on, and consider the VeniceWriter being closed while it is actually not. (A leaking venicewriter can cause several issues, e.g. a stuck consumer thread etc.) This change adds a retry of ungraceful close if gracefulClose flag is set to true and it failed. In this case, ungraceful close will skip the flushing step and it should always succeed (e.g. StoreIngestionTask.kill()). For cases where gracefulClose is set to false, this change doesn't change anything.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…d in VeniceWriter
In VeniceWriter.close(), when gracefulClose is set to true, Kafka producer call the underlining method, which tries to flush the buffered data before closing it (see ApacheKafkaProducerAdapter.close). However, when exception happens (e.g. timeout), today, VeniceWriter only logs the exception, moves on, and consider the VeniceWriter being closed while it is actually not. (A leaking Venicewriter can cause several issues, e.g. a stuck consumer thread etc.)
This change adds a retry of ungraceful close if gracefulClose flag is set to true and it failed. In this case, ungraceful close will skip the flushing step and it should always succeed (e.g. StoreIngestionTask.kill()). For cases where gracefulClose is set to false, this change doesn't change anything.
How was this PR tested?
Unit test.
CI.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing changes?