[DRAFT] Reduce consumer lock contention in PartitionOffsetFetcherImpl #682
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rename caller protected methods to use fetch prefix Fix test
sushantmane
force-pushed
the
li-consumer-endOffset-custom-timeout
branch
from
6d3d2d1
to
73ed929
Compare
|
This issue is being addressed under TopicManager refactoring: sushantmane#10 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[DRAFT] Reduce consumer lock contention in PartitionOffsetFetcherImpl
Resolves #XXX
How was this PR tested?
WIP
Does this PR introduce any user-facing changes?