Setup swagger #31
Setup swagger #31
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates to enhance API documentation and routing capabilities. Key changes include the addition of new dependencies for Swagger documentation in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/routes/v1/docs.ts (2)
6-6: Consider adding error handling for Swagger specification creationThe Swagger specification is correctly set up using
swaggerJSDocand the importedswaggerDef. However, it might be beneficial to add error handling to catch any potential issues during the creation of the Swagger specification.Consider wrapping the specification creation in a try-catch block:
-const swaggerSpec = swaggerJSDoc(swaggerDef) +let swaggerSpec; +try { + swaggerSpec = swaggerJSDoc(swaggerDef); +} catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to generate Swagger specification:', error); + // You might want to set a default spec or re-throw the error +}
8-11: Consider the mounting path and versioning for Swagger UIThe Express router is correctly set up and exported. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
Serving Swagger UI at the root path (
'/') might not be ideal if this router is intended to be mounted under a specific path. It could potentially conflict with other routes.There's no versioning in the Swagger UI URL, which might be an issue for API versioning.
Consider the following suggestions:
- If this router is meant to be mounted under a specific path (e.g.,
/api/v1/docs), you might want to serve Swagger UI at a sub-path:-router.use('/', swaggerUi.serve, swaggerUi.setup(swaggerSpec)) +router.use('/swagger', swaggerUi.serve, swaggerUi.setup(swaggerSpec))
- To support API versioning, you could include the version in the Swagger UI path:
-router.use('/', swaggerUi.serve, swaggerUi.setup(swaggerSpec)) +router.use('/v1', swaggerUi.serve, swaggerUi.setup(swaggerSpec))These changes would make the documentation more flexible and future-proof.
tsconfig.json (1)
11-12: Consider adding trailing comma for consistencyFor better consistency and to reduce potential diff noise in future changes, consider adding a trailing comma to the last item in the
compilerOptionsobject.Here's the suggested change:
{ "compilerOptions": { ... "skipLibCheck": true, - "resolveJsonModule": true + "resolveJsonModule": true, }, ... }src/docs/components.yml (1)
43-43: Add a newline at the end of the fileTo comply with YAML best practices and resolve the yamllint error, add a newline at the end of the file.
Add a newline after line 43.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
src/routes/v1/auth.ts (2)
8-57: Great job on adding OpenAPI documentation! Consider these enhancements.The OpenAPI documentation for the
/auth/registerendpoint is well-structured and provides comprehensive information. Here are some suggestions to further improve it:
- Add possible error responses (e.g., 400 for validation errors, 409 for email already in use).
- Enhance the password description to be more specific about the special characters allowed.
- Update the example password to meet all stated requirements.
Here's a suggested improvement for the password description and example:
* minLength: 8 -* description: at least one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number, and one special character +* description: At least one uppercase letter, one lowercase letter, one number, and one special character (!@#$%^&*) * example: * name: fake name * email: [email protected] -* password: Aa123123@ +* password: P@ssw0rd!Additionally, consider adding error responses:
* responses: * 201: * description: Created * content: * application/json: * schema: * type: object * properties: * data: * $ref: '#/components/schemas/User' +* 400: +* description: Bad Request +* content: +* application/json: +* schema: +* $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error' +* 409: +* description: Conflict - Email already in use +* content: +* application/json: +* schema: +* $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'These additions will provide a more complete API documentation for consumers of your API.
Line range hint
59-73: Consider adding OpenAPI documentation for remaining endpoints.To complete the Swagger setup, it would be beneficial to add OpenAPI documentation for the
/login,/logout, and/refreshendpoints. This will provide a comprehensive API documentation for all authentication-related endpoints.Here's a template you can use for the
/loginendpoint:/** * @openapi * /auth/login: * post: * summary: Login * tags: [Auth] * requestBody: * required: true * content: * application/json: * schema: * type: object * required: * - email * - password * properties: * email: * type: string * format: email * password: * type: string * format: password * responses: * 200: * description: Successful login * content: * application/json: * schema: * type: object * properties: * tokens: * $ref: '#/components/schemas/AuthTokens' * user: * $ref: '#/components/schemas/User' * 401: * description: Invalid credentials * content: * application/json: * schema: * $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error' */Similar documentation can be added for the
/logoutand/refreshendpoints. This will ensure that your API is fully documented and easily understandable for consumers.src/routes/v1/index.ts (1)
30-34: Broaden Environment Check for Development RoutesThe condition
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development'restricts thedevRoutesto the development environment only. If you have other non-production environments (like 'staging' or 'test') where you might want the documentation available, consider adjusting the condition.For example, you can include the docs in all non-production environments:
-if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { +if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production') {This ensures that the documentation is accessible in all non-production environments, which can be beneficial for testing and demonstration purposes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- src/docs/components.yml (1 hunks)
- src/docs/swaggerDef.ts (1 hunks)
- src/routes/v1/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- src/routes/v1/docs.ts (1 hunks)
- src/routes/v1/index.ts (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
src/docs/components.yml
36-37: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
🪛 yamllint
src/docs/components.yml
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/routes/v1/docs.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are correctly set upThe necessary modules for setting up Swagger documentation are properly imported. The separation of Swagger definition into a separate file (
swaggerDef) is a good practice for maintainability.
1-11: Overall, good implementation with room for minor enhancementsThe Swagger setup is well-implemented and follows good practices. The code successfully creates a router to serve Swagger UI for API documentation. Consider the suggested improvements for error handling and route flexibility to make the implementation more robust and versatile.
tsconfig.json (1)
12-12: LGTM: Addition ofresolveJsonModuleoptionThe addition of
"resolveJsonModule": trueis appropriate for setting up Swagger, as it allows TypeScript to import JSON files as modules. This change aligns well with the PR objective of setting up Swagger.src/docs/swaggerDef.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate imports for Swagger configuration.The imports from
package.jsonand the localenvconfiguration are well-chosen for setting up the Swagger definition. This approach allows for dynamic configuration based on the project's metadata and environment settings.
5-5: LGTM: Comprehensive API file scanning.The
apisproperty is well-configured to scan both YAML documentation files and TypeScript route files. This setup provides flexibility in how API documentation is written and maintained.
6-16: LGTM: Well-structured Swagger definition using project metadata.The
swaggerDefinitionis well-organized and makes good use of thepackage.jsonfile for project metadata. This approach ensures that the API documentation stays in sync with the project's information.
1-23: Overall, excellent implementation of Swagger configuration.The
swaggerDef.tsfile provides a well-structured and flexible configuration for Swagger documentation. It effectively utilizes project metadata frompackage.jsonand allows for both YAML and TypeScript-based API definitions. The only suggested improvement is to make the server URL more environment-aware for easier deployment across different environments.Great job on setting up Swagger for the project!
src/docs/components.yml (2)
3-37: LGTM: Well-structured User schemaThe User schema is well-defined with appropriate properties, types, and formats. The use of enums for the
roleproperty is a good practice for restricting values.🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
36-37: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
39-43: LGTM: Correct security scheme definitionThe
bearerAuthsecurity scheme is correctly defined, specifying the use of JWT for bearer token authentication.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
package.json (3)
37-38: LGTM: Swagger dependencies added correctly.The addition of
swagger-jsdocandswagger-ui-expressis appropriate for setting up Swagger documentation. The use of caret (^) version ranges allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.
55-56: LGTM: Swagger type definitions added correctly.The addition of
@types/swagger-jsdocand@types/swagger-ui-expressas devDependencies is correct. These type definitions correspond to the main Swagger dependencies and will improve TypeScript support in the project.
Line range hint
1-74: Overall assessment: Changes are appropriate and align with PR objectives.The modifications to
package.jsonare focused and correctly implement the addition of Swagger dependencies. This aligns perfectly with the PR objective of setting up Swagger. The changes include both the main dependencies and their corresponding TypeScript type definitions, which is a comprehensive approach. No other unrelated changes were made, maintaining the integrity of the existing project setup.src/routes/v1/index.ts (2)
2-4: Consistent Naming Convention for Route ImportsRenaming imports to include the
Routesuffix (authRoute,userRoute,docsRoute) enhances code readability and maintains consistency across your route definitions. This practice helps in clearly distinguishing route modules from other imports.
8-17: Efficient Route Management with Route ArraysIntroducing the
defaultRoutesarray to manage routes improves scalability and maintainability. This structure allows for easier addition or removal of routes as the application evolves, promoting cleaner and more organized code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/routes/v1/index.ts (2)
7-20: LGTM: Improved route organization with defaultRoutes arrayThe introduction of the
defaultRoutesarray and its usage improves code organization and maintainability. It allows for easier addition or removal of routes in the future. The forEach loop for setting up routes is a clean and efficient approach.Consider adding a type annotation for
defaultRoutesto improve type safety:const defaultRoutes: { path: string; route: express.Router }[] = [ // ... existing routes ];
22-36: LGTM: Improved conditional routing for development environmentThe implementation of conditional routing for the development environment is a good practice. It ensures that development-specific routes (like documentation) are only available when needed. The dynamic import of
docsRouteaddresses the concern raised in the past review comment about moving development-only imports inside the conditional block.Consider optimizing the dynamic import by moving it outside the route handler to avoid potential delays on each request:
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { const devRoutes = [ { path: '/docs', route: async () => { const docsRoute = await import('./docs'); return docsRoute.default; }, }, ]; devRoutes.forEach(async (route) => { const resolvedRoute = await route.route(); router.use(route.path, resolvedRoute); }); }This approach ensures that the dynamic import is only executed once when setting up the routes, rather than on each request.
src/docs/components.yml (1)
43-43: Minor: Add newline at end of fileTo adhere to YAML best practices and resolve the yamllint warning, please add a newline character at the end of the file.
Apply this change:
scheme: bearer bearerFormat: JWT +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/docs/components.yml (1 hunks)
- src/routes/v1/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
src/docs/components.yml
36-37: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
🪛 yamllint
src/docs/components.yml
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/routes/v1/index.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM: Improved import naming conventionThe renaming of
authtoauthRouteandusertouserRouteenhances code readability by explicitly indicating that these are route modules. This change aligns with best practices for naming in Express applications.
1-36: Great job on improving the overall structure!The changes made to this file have significantly improved its structure, maintainability, and adherence to best practices. The introduction of
defaultRoutesanddevRoutesarrays, along with the conditional routing for the development environment, makes the code more organized and easier to manage.The concerns raised in the past review comment about moving development-only imports and routes inside the conditional block have been addressed. The dynamic import of
docsRouteis a good solution, although there's room for further optimization as suggested in the previous comment.Overall, these changes represent a substantial improvement in the code quality and structure of the routing logic.
src/docs/components.yml (4)
3-37: LGTM: Well-structured User schemaThe User schema is well-defined with appropriate types and formats for each property. The inclusion of an enum for the 'role' property is a good practice for constraining possible values.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
36-37: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
36-36: Security improvement: JWT placeholder implementedThank you for addressing the previous security concern by replacing the real JWT with a placeholder value. This change aligns with best practices for avoiding potential security risks in documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
36-37: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
39-43: LGTM: Proper JWT bearer token authentication setupThe security scheme is correctly defined for JWT bearer token authentication. This setup aligns well with the User schema that includes a token property.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
1-43: Overall: Well-structured Swagger/OpenAPI component definitionsThe
components.ymlfile is well-structured and follows OpenAPI/Swagger conventions. It provides a comprehensive User schema and sets up proper JWT bearer token authentication. The minor suggestions provided will further improve the file's adherence to best practices.🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
36-37: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
🪛 yamllint
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/docs/components.yml (2)
38-42: Approve Token schema with a minor suggestionThe Token schema is correctly defined as a string with JWT format. However, there's a small structural issue in the example:
Consider adjusting the example structure:
Token: type: string format: jwt example: - token: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiaWF0IjoxNTE2MjM5MDIyfQ.SflKxwRJSMeKKF2QT4fwpMeJf36POk6yJV_adQssw5c + eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiaWF0IjoxNTE2MjM5MDIyfQ.SflKxwRJSMeKKF2QT4fwpMeJf36POk6yJV_adQssw5cThis change removes the unnecessary
token:key in the example, as the Token schema itself represents a token string.
51-51: Add a newline at the end of the fileTo improve consistency and adhere to common YAML style guidelines, add a newline character at the end of the file.
Simply add an empty line at the end of the file to resolve this minor issue.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 51-51: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
src/routes/v1/auth.ts (2)
15-58: LGTM: Comprehensive documentation for /auth/register endpoint with minor suggestions.The OpenAPI documentation for the register endpoint is well-structured and informative. Here are a few suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider specifying the allowed special characters for the password in the description.
- It might be beneficial to add examples for error responses (e.g., email already exists, invalid password format).
Would you like me to provide examples of error response documentation?
65-103: LGTM: Well-documented /auth/login endpoint with suggestions for enhancement.The OpenAPI documentation for the login endpoint is thorough and well-structured. Here are a few suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider adding token information to the response schema, as login endpoints typically return authentication tokens.
- It might be beneficial to add examples for error responses (e.g., invalid credentials).
Consider updating the response schema to include token information. For example:
responses: content: application/json: schema: type: object properties: user: $ref: '#/components/schemas/User' tokens: $ref: '#/components/schemas/AuthTokens'Would you like me to provide a more detailed example of this change?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/docs/components.yml (1 hunks)
- src/routes/v1/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- src/routes/v1/user.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/routes/v1/user.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
src/docs/components.yml
36-37: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
42-43: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
🪛 yamllint
src/docs/components.yml
[error] 51-51: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/docs/components.yml (2)
3-37: LGTM: Well-structured User schema with good security practicesThe User schema is well-defined with appropriate types and formats for each field. Notable good practices:
- The password example uses a bcrypt hash, which is a secure way to store passwords.
- The token field now uses a placeholder JWT, addressing the previous security concern.
- The
isVerifiedfield is correctly defined as a boolean.🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
36-37: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.
(jwt)
43-51: LGTM: Well-defined security schemesThe security schemes are correctly defined:
bearerAuthuses HTTP Bearer scheme with JWT format, which is standard for token-based authentication.refreshTokenAuthis appropriately set up as an API key in a cookie, which is a secure method for handling refresh tokens.These definitions align well with best practices for JWT authentication and refresh token handling.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 51-51: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
src/routes/v1/auth.ts (4)
8-13: LGTM: Auth tag definition is clear and concise.The OpenAPI tag for Auth is well-defined, providing a clear name and description for authentication-related endpoints.
Line range hint
1-152: Great addition of OpenAPI documentation for authentication endpoints!The changes in this file significantly improve the API documentation by adding comprehensive OpenAPI specifications for all authentication endpoints. This enhancement will make it easier for developers to understand and integrate with the authentication system.
Key points:
- All major authentication endpoints (register, login, logout, refresh) are now well-documented.
- The documentation follows OpenAPI standards and provides clear information about request/response structures.
- No changes were made to the existing route handlers' logic, ensuring that the actual implementation remains unchanged.
The suggestions provided in the review aim to further improve the documentation's clarity and completeness. Overall, this is a valuable addition to the project that will enhance its maintainability and ease of use.
131-149: LGTM: Well-documented /auth/refresh endpoint with minor enhancement suggestions.The OpenAPI documentation for the refresh token endpoint is concise and well-structured. Here are a few suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider providing more details about what's included in the Token schema, either inline or by ensuring the referenced schema is well-documented.
- It might be beneficial to add examples for error responses (e.g., invalid or expired refresh token).
To verify the Token schema definition, let's check for its implementation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the Token schema definition # Test: Search for the Token schema definition rg --type typescript 'export\s+interface\s+Token' srcConsider adding error response documentation. For example:
responses: # ... (keep existing 200 response) description: Unauthorized content: application/json: schema: type: object properties: message: type: string example: "Invalid or expired refresh token"Would you like me to provide a more detailed example of this change?
110-128: LGTM: Clear documentation for /auth/logout endpoint with minor suggestions.The OpenAPI documentation for the logout endpoint is concise and well-structured. Here are a few suggestions for further improvement:
- Verify if 'refreshTokenAuth' is the intended authentication method for logout. Typically, access tokens are used for such operations.
- Consider adding a success message to the response schema instead of a null data property.
To verify the authentication method used in the logout route, let's check the implementation:
Consider updating the response schema to include a success message. For example:
responses: content: application/json: schema: type: object properties: message: type: string example: "Successfully logged out"Would you like me to provide a more detailed example of this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
UserandTokenobjects, along with security schemes for authentication.Bug Fixes
Documentation
/auth/register,/auth/login,/auth/logout, and/auth/refreshendpoints.Chores