Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deleteUser #29

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

deleteUser #29

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

likui628
Copy link
Owner

@likui628 likui628 commented Oct 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new DELETE route for user deletion, allowing authenticated users with the appropriate permissions to remove users.
    • Added a validation schema for user deletion requests to ensure proper request structure.
    • Expanded user management capabilities with a new function for deleting users by ID.
  • Bug Fixes

    • None
  • Documentation

    • None
  • Refactor

    • None
  • Style

    • None
  • Tests

    • None
  • Chores

    • None
  • Revert

    • None

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new user deletion feature within the application. A deleteUser function is added to the user controller, which processes HTTP DELETE requests to remove users by their ID. Corresponding routes and validation schemas are also established to support this functionality, ensuring proper authentication and authorization checks. The service layer includes a new deleteUserById function to interact with the database for user deletion. Existing functionalities for user management remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/controllers/user.ts Added deleteUser function to handle DELETE requests for user deletion.
src/routes/v1/user.ts Introduced a new DELETE route /:userId for user deletion, protected by authentication and role checks.
src/services/user.ts Added deleteUserById function to delete a user from the database using Prisma.
src/validations/user.ts Created deleteUserSchema for validating user deletion requests, reusing logic from getUserSchema.

Possibly related PRs

  • deleteUser #29: The changes in this PR directly relate to the main PR as it introduces the same deleteUser function in src/controllers/user.ts, which is the primary focus of the main PR.

Poem

🐰 In the garden where users roam,
A new path leads them safely home.
With a swift delete, they take their flight,
Leaving behind, in the soft moonlight.
A hop, a skip, a joyful cheer,
For every user, we hold dear! 🌙


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/validations/user.ts (1)

28-29: Consider a more explicit schema definition for deleteUserSchema.

The current implementation reuses getUserSchema for deleteUserSchema, which ensures consistency and reduces code duplication. This approach is valid if the delete operation only requires a user ID for validation.

However, consider the following suggestions:

  1. If the delete operation requires additional parameters or has different validation rules, define deleteUserSchema explicitly rather than reusing getUserSchema.

  2. To make the intention clear and maintain flexibility for future changes, you could define deleteUserSchema more explicitly:

export const deleteUserSchema = z.object({
  params: z.object({
    userId: z.string().uuid(),
  }),
})
  1. Add a comment explaining the intentional reuse of getUserSchema if you decide to keep the current implementation.
src/routes/v1/user.ts (1)

32-37: LGTM! Consider additional safeguards for user deletion.

The new DELETE route for '/:userId' is well-structured and follows the existing patterns in the file. It's properly secured with authentication, authorization, and input validation. However, consider the following suggestions to enhance safety and prevent potential issues:

  1. Implement a check to prevent users from deleting their own accounts through this route.
  2. Add a confirmation step or a "soft delete" option to prevent accidental deletions.
  3. Ensure that the deleteUserSchema includes proper validation for the userId parameter.
  4. Consider logging the deletion action for audit purposes.

Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?

src/services/user.ts (1)

91-102: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling and return value.

The deleteUserById function is well-implemented and follows the pattern of other functions in this file. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:

  1. Consider returning a boolean or the deleted user object to confirm successful deletion.
  2. Enhance error handling to differentiate between "user not found" and other types of errors.
  3. Add a check to ensure the user exists before attempting to delete.

Here's a suggested implementation incorporating these improvements:

export const deleteUserById = async (id: string): Promise<User | null> => {
  try {
    const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id } });
    if (!user) {
      logger.warn(`User with id ${id} not found for deletion`);
      return null;
    }
    const deletedUser = await prisma.user.delete({ where: { id } });
    return deletedUser;
  } catch (err: unknown) {
    logger.error(`Failed to delete user by id: ${JSON.stringify(err)}`);
    if (err instanceof Prisma.PrismaClientKnownRequestError) {
      // Handle specific Prisma errors if needed
    }
    throw new Error('Failed to delete user by id');
  }
}

This implementation:

  • Returns the deleted user object on success, or null if the user wasn't found.
  • Checks for the user's existence before attempting deletion.
  • Provides more specific error logging.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8ce64cd and 000682f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/controllers/user.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/routes/v1/user.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/services/user.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/validations/user.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/routes/v1/user.ts (1)

32-37: Verify route consistency and security

Let's ensure that the new DELETE route is consistent with other routes and that there are no potential security issues.

Run the following script to verify route consistency and security:

This script will help us verify:

  1. All necessary imports are present
  2. Consistent use of middlewares across routes
  3. No obvious security issues in route definitions
  4. Existence of the deleteUserSchema in the validation file
  5. Implementation of the deleteUser method in the controller

Please review the output of this script to ensure everything is in order.

src/controllers/user.ts (1)

25-28: Verify integration with routes and documentation

The deleteUser function is well-integrated with the existing code structure in this file. However, to ensure full integration:

  1. Verify that the corresponding route for this delete operation has been added to the router file (typically something like src/routes/user.ts).
  2. Ensure that any API documentation (e.g., Swagger/OpenAPI specs) has been updated to include this new endpoint.
  3. Check if there are any frontend components or other services that need to be updated to use this new deletion functionality.

To help verify the route integration, you can run the following command:

This will search for any delete routes related to users in the routes directory.

src/services/user.ts (1)

91-102: Verify the usage of deleteUserById in the application.

The new deleteUserById function is well-integrated with the existing code structure. To ensure its proper implementation:

  1. Verify that this function is being called correctly in the relevant controllers or resolvers.
  2. Ensure that appropriate access controls are in place for user deletion operations.
  3. Check if any cleanup operations (e.g., deleting related data) are needed when a user is deleted.

Run the following script to check the usage of deleteUserById:

src/controllers/user.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@likui628 likui628 merged commit 5134305 into main Oct 2, 2024
4 checks passed
@likui628 likui628 deleted the deleteuser branch October 2, 2024 13:46
This was referenced Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant