Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JsonManifestStrategy, support for FormatExtensionResolver #1588

Conversation

wouterSkepp
Copy link
Contributor

Q A
Branch? 2.13
Bug fix? no
New feature? yes
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Fixed tickets #1524
License MIT
Doc

Apologies, this got very stale.
My initial PR that resulted in #1529 was not supporting format changes; If a filter was to convert a jpg to webp, then the versioned asset would still be served with the .jpg extension.

When applying the FormatExtensionResolver, this is now handled. Versioned JSON manifest assets get their extension swapped as well.

I've bumped the target version to 2.13.

@dbu dbu changed the base branch from json_manifest_version_strategy_support to 2.x June 11, 2024 12:01
@dbu dbu changed the base branch from 2.x to json_manifest_version_strategy_support June 11, 2024 12:02
@dbu
Copy link
Member

dbu commented Jun 11, 2024

thanks a lot for picking this up. there are conflicts (and the diff shows the changes already in #1529). can you squash the commits and rebase on json_manifest_version_strategy_support and solve conflicts? then it will be visible what actually changes in this pull request.

@wouterSkepp wouterSkepp force-pushed the update-versioning-documentation branch from e1f15c4 to b5b5569 Compare June 11, 2024 12:43
@wouterSkepp
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks a lot for picking this up. there are conflicts (and the diff shows the changes already in #1529). can you squash the commits and rebase on json_manifest_version_strategy_support and solve conflicts? then it will be visible what actually changes in this pull request.

Thank you, done

@dbu dbu merged commit 4c911b2 into liip:json_manifest_version_strategy_support Jun 19, 2024
14 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants