-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed #1452 #1476
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fixed #1452 #1476
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1476 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.69% 94.70%
=======================================
Files 12 12
Lines 1943 1946 +3
=======================================
+ Hits 1840 1843 +3
Misses 103 103 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughThe changes focus on enhancing the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
custom_components/ocpp/ocppv16.py (1)
274-278
: Consider adding debug logging before warning.The warning logs are helpful, but consider adding debug logs before the warning to help with troubleshooting. This would provide more context about what led to the failure.
+ _LOGGER.debug( + "Connector %d status notification failed with response: %s", + id, + resp.status, + ) _LOGGER.warning( "Forcing number of connectors to %d, charger returned %d", id - 1, nof_connectors, )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
custom_components/ocpp/ocppv16.py
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
custom_components/ocpp/ocppv16.py (2)
274-281
: Enhance error handling for connector status notification failures.The changes improve the robustness of connector state management by:
- Logging detailed information about connector count mismatches
- Ensuring a minimum of one connector remains active
- Breaking the loop on first failure to prevent cascading errors
This aligns with the PR objective to handle connector state notification trigger failures more gracefully.
Let's verify the connector state handling in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Connector count handling is correctly implemented
The changes properly handle connector count mismatches by:
- Maintaining system stability with a minimum of one connector
- Breaking on first failure to prevent cascading errors
- Providing detailed logging for debugging
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other connector state handling implementations and potential edge cases # Search for connector state handling patterns rg -A 5 "connector_id.*status_notification" # Search for connector metrics updates rg -A 5 "connectors.*value.*=.*"Length of output: 1035
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for status notification and connector-related patterns rg -A 10 "status_notification|StatusNotification" # Search for connector-related error handling rg -A 5 "connector.*error|error.*connector" # Find metric usage rg -A 3 "cdet\.connectors"Length of output: 25582
279-279
: Verify the minimum connector count assumption.The code assumes that having at least one connector is valid:
self._metrics[cdet.connectors.value].value = max(1, id - 1) return_value = id > 1Please verify this assumption with the OCPP specification. Some charge points might be valid with zero connectors in specific states.
Let's check the codebase for zero-connector handling:
Also applies to: 280-280
✅ Verification successful
The minimum connector count assumption is correct
The code's assumption is valid. In OCPP 1.6:
- Connector ID 0 represents the charge point's main controller (not a physical connector)
- Physical connectors are numbered from 1 onwards
- The code correctly handles both cases:
- Special handling for connector_id=0 for main controller status
- max(1, id - 1) for counting physical connectors
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for zero-connector handling patterns # Search for connector count validations rg "connector.*=.*0" # Search for connector-related error handling ast-grep --pattern 'if $_connector.* [=<>]+ 0 { $$$ }'Length of output: 766
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for OCPP 1.6 connector documentation rg -i "connector.*0|connector.*id" custom_components/ocpp/const.py custom_components/ocpp/ocppv16.py -A 2 # Search for any documentation files fd "README|OCPP|\.md$" --exec cat {}Length of output: 44826
In case connector state notification trigger fails, stop and force the number of connectors equal to last succeeded connector, with a minimum of 1
Summary by CodeRabbit