Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: kyve spec, mainnet and testnet #1547

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: kyve spec, mainnet and testnet #1547

wants to merge 4 commits into from
+1,587 −0

Conversation

RuslanGlaznyov
Copy link
Contributor

@RuslanGlaznyov RuslanGlaznyov commented Jul 8, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Description

Added Spec for Kyve, mainnet and testnet

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • read the contribution guide

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:

  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change

  • targeted the main branch

  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification

  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary

  • included the necessary unit and integration tests

  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code

  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added new specifications for Kyve Mainnet, including block time, stake requirements, API endpoints, and verification details.
    • Added new specifications for Kyve Testnet, detailing provider types, block configurations, API collections, and verification parameters.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The addition of kyve_mainnet.json and kyve_testnet.json files introduces comprehensive specifications for the Kyve mainnet and testnet. These files outline important parameters such as block time, stake requirements, API endpoints, and verification criteria, ensuring a structured and detailed approach to network configuration and functionality.

Changes

Files Summary
cookbook/specs/kyve_mainnet.json Added the Kyve mainnet specification, specifying block parameters, stake requirements, API details, and more.
cookbook/specs/kyve_testnet.json Added the Kyve testnet specification, defining provider types, block configurations, APIs, and verification.

Poem

In files of JSON, clear and bright,
To mainnet and testnet, we take flight.
With APIs and stakes defined so well,
A story of Kyve network we now tell.
Hopping through code, we smile with glee,
For networks robust and specs set free.
🐇✨🌐

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 8, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66f1933 and 1324587.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • cookbook/specs/kyve_mainnet.json (1 hunks)
  • cookbook/specs/kyve_testnet.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (18)
cookbook/specs/kyve_mainnet.json (9)

3-4: Metadata looks good.

The title and description provide a clear and concise summary of the proposal.

7-24: Basic details look good.

The index, name, enabled status, imports, provider types, and various thresholds and limits are correctly specified.

25-86: REST API endpoints look good.

The endpoints and their configurations are correctly specified.

87-412: gRPC API endpoints look good.

The endpoints and their configurations are correctly specified.

413-785: Tendermint RPC API endpoints look good.

The endpoints and their configurations are correctly specified.

791-791: Deposit amount looks good.

The deposit amount is correctly specified.

416-436: Verifications look good.

The verifications are correctly specified.

437-445: Extensions look good.

The extensions are correctly specified.

16-17: Finalization details look good.

The finalization details are correctly specified.

cookbook/specs/kyve_testnet.json (9)

3-4: Metadata looks good.

The title and description provide a clear and concise summary of the proposal.

7-24: Basic details look good.

The index, name, enabled status, imports, provider types, and various thresholds and limits are correctly specified.

25-86: REST API endpoints look good.

The endpoints and their configurations are correctly specified.

87-412: gRPC API endpoints look good.

The endpoints and their configurations are correctly specified.

413-785: Tendermint RPC API endpoints look good.

The endpoints and their configurations are correctly specified.

791-791: Deposit amount looks good.

The deposit amount is correctly specified.

416-436: Verifications look good.

The verifications are correctly specified.

437-445: Extensions look good.

The extensions are correctly specified.

16-17: Finalization details look good.

The finalization details are correctly specified.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C:specs
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@RuslanGlaznyov