Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor RISC-V instruction models #631

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

xThaid
Copy link

@xThaid xThaid commented Mar 27, 2024

The change in #627 was not fully working and while fixing it, I realized that the solution we had previously was not perfect. Based on the dependency we have removed, riscv-model, I made a refactor to avoid repeating code.

@xThaid xThaid added the refactor Doesn't change functionality, but makes stuff nicer label Mar 27, 2024
@xThaid xThaid mentioned this pull request Mar 27, 2024
6 tasks
coreblocks/params/instr.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coreblocks/params/instr.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coreblocks/params/instr.py Show resolved Hide resolved
coreblocks/params/instr.py Show resolved Hide resolved
coreblocks/params/instr.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coreblocks/params/instr.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tilk tilk merged commit 8ec353d into kuznia-rdzeni:master Apr 1, 2024
8 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor Doesn't change functionality, but makes stuff nicer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants