Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dockerfiles #515

Merged

Conversation

lekcyjna123
Copy link
Contributor

While updating #454 I have found that we don't have venv in dockers, so it have to be manually installed before running the regression tests by hand. Here is a PR which update dockers to contain this package. Additionally I integrated changes added by @piotro888 in #513 to update dockers only once.

(Dockers are being currently uploaded)

Comment on lines 3 to +10
RUN apt-get update && \
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive \
apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \
autoconf automake autotools-dev curl python3 bc lsb-release \
autoconf automake autotools-dev curl python3.11 python3.11-venv python3-pip bc lsb-release \
libmpc-dev libmpfr-dev libgmp-dev gawk build-essential \
bison flex texinfo gperf libtool patchutils zlib1g-dev \
libexpat-dev ninja-build git ca-certificates python-is-python3 && \
bison flex texinfo gperf libtool patchutils zlib1g-dev device-tree-compiler \
libexpat-dev ninja-build git ca-certificates python-is-python3 \
libssl-dev libbz2-dev libreadline-dev libsqlite3-dev libncursesw5-dev xz-utils tk-dev libxml2-dev libxmlsec1-dev libffi-dev liblzma-dev && \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Regarding your comment #513 (comment) and this change - I don't think that running apt-get only in the first RUN is that better. Opposite has its benefits - if I wanted to add another tool like spike, with its dependencies I only created next layer that is entirely dedicated to the tool. I didn't modify previous layers, so I didn't need to rebuild the entire container (cached versions of first two steps were used) or upload first two layers again. I would be for this option, as it is useful for updating and developing containers.
Are there some benefits of installing everything in first step, that I am missing?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a benefit that you don't call apt update multiple times, so you generate lower traffic for Debian servers.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But on the other hand, when your are adding new tool with new package dependencies as a new step, instead of installing all of the packages again at rebuild, you use cached previous docker layers and only download the newly added packages, which creates even less traffic.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that there is rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* in the end of the command. This will make the resulting docker image smaller (by noticeable amount), as all the files that we are going to delete will be ephemeral (and won't exist in the resulting image). If we split that into two RUN instructions, the contents of /var/lib/apt/lists/ would be saved as part of the first layer (each instruction is a new layer).

Copy link
Member

@piotro888 piotro888 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, lets merge it. I will merge it to my PR after this one is on master

eval "$(pyenv init --path)" && \
pyenv install 3.6.15 && \
pyenv global 3.6.15 && \
python -V && \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please remove this line

@tilk tilk merged commit 324ce64 into kuznia-rdzeni:master Dec 1, 2023
5 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants