7435 Support New Alibaba Cloud ENV Variables names for RRSA Authoriza…

[maximrub]

Which component this PR applies to?

cluster-autoscaler

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds support for the newly declared official environment variable names by Alibaba Cloud for RRSA to authorize pods to access different cloud services. This change enables compatibility with both the existing and new ENV variable names, ensuring seamless authorization for pods accessing various Alibaba Cloud services.
This update is essential for users transitioning to the updated naming conventions while maintaining support for legacy configurations.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #7435

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

no

NONE

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: maximrub
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign x13n for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• cluster-autoscaler/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @maximrub. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[Shubham82]

/ok-to-test

[Shubham82]

cc @ringtail

[ringtail]

cc @IrisIris Pls take a look.

[maximrub]

Hi @ringtail, can someone have a look?

[ringtail]

Hi @ringtail, can someone have a look?

I‘ll ping @IrisIris again.

[IrisIris]

@maximrub LGTM. It would be even better if you could add a unit test for this new function 'FirstNotEmpty'.

[maximrub]

@maximrub LGTM. It would be even better if you could add a unit test for this new function 'FirstNotEmpty'.

@IrisIris added a UT
bfc0563

[maximrub]

@Shubham82 can you help with this pr also? thank you

[Shubham82]

It seems good to me, I will LGTM once it is confirmed by the owner CC @ringtail @IrisIris.

[IrisIris]

LGTM

[Shubham82]

/lgtm

[Shubham82]

cc @x13n
Please approve this PR, so that it will merge (as it was reviewed by Alicoud owners)

Thanks!

[k8s-ci-robot]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[x13n]

Thanks! Can you also squash the commits?

[maximrub]

Thanks! Can you also squash the commits?

@x13n done