Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential Path Issues #25

Open
sdl60660 opened this issue Dec 31, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Potential Path Issues #25

sdl60660 opened this issue Dec 31, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@sdl60660
Copy link
Collaborator

sdl60660 commented Dec 31, 2021

I've noticed a couple of naming issues where features are over-grouped or over-extended at the end of paths, potentially related to these paths running through numerous large inland features? Not sure if the terminal flag/stream level properties might be impacted by the path running through something like the Great Lakes?

The River Runner tool now overrides names on flowlines inside of inland features, so it might be a little easier to see with on the IoW plots:

@sdl60660
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sdl60660 commented Jan 2, 2022

I think a similar thing is happening here, in Norway, involving a large inland lake, but could be wrong: path

@gerwitz
Copy link

gerwitz commented Jan 5, 2022

I think I see a similar issue here in the Netherlands (which is, admittedly, designed to foil tools like this). The Amstel river might as well not exist, a “droplet placement” on the river itself will jump elsewhere.

@ksonda
Copy link
Owner

ksonda commented Jan 5, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants