Support XDG spec for providers cache dir #170
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Can anyone review this, please? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this do / why do we need it?
Allow to place providers cache by XDG spec, like
${XDG_CACHE_HOME}/m1-terraform-provider-helper/with fallback to current default${HOME}/.m1-terraform-provider-helper/How this PR fixes the problem?
On app configuration init, searching for existing directory via xdg.SearchCacheFile and if
${XDG_CACHE_HOME}/m1-terraform-provider-helper/not found, fallback to${HOME}/.m1-terraform-provider-helper/What should your reviewer look out for in this PR?
Terraform itself still doesn't support XDG spec, so
xdg.SearchDataFile("terraform")probably will always return error, but this allows to use custom terraform build or tofu.Check lists
Additional Comments (if any)
{Please write here}
Which issue(s) does this PR fix?