Add TAKE_PTR() #264
Closed
Add TAKE_PTR() #264
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Similar to macro in systemd codebase: add a macro that documents we are "leaking" a pointer that would otherwise be cleaned up by the cleanup attribute. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]>
lucasdemarchi
force-pushed
the
tip-take-ptr
branch
from
d766da5 to
4d3f237
Compare
evelikov
reviewed
Dec 2, 2024
evelikov
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
|
Applied, thanks |
lucasdemarchi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2024
Similar to macro in systemd codebase: add a macro that documents we are "leaking" a pointer that would otherwise be cleaned up by the cleanup attribute. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]> Link: #264
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Similar to macro in systemd codebase: add a macro that documents we are "leaking" a pointer that would otherwise be cleaned up by the cleanup attribute.