Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

README.md: add SAST/PVS-Studio section #133

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

evelikov
Copy link
Collaborator

We'd like to add PVS-Studio analysis to the repo and their free open-source license requires we had a small acknowledgement in our README.md. Seems simple and fair ;-)

https://pvs-studio.com/en/order/open-source-license/


Once this lands we (@lucasdemarchi?) will need to fill-in the form at the bottom of linked site.

We'd like to add PVS-Studio analysis to the repo and their free
open-source license requires we had a small acknowledgement in our
README.md. Seems simple and fair ;-)

https://pvs-studio.com/en/order/open-source-license/
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>

[PVS-Studio] - static analyzer for C, C++, C#, and Java code.

[PVS-Studio]: https://pvs-studio.com/en/pvs-studio/?utm_source=website&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=open_source
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there at least 1 useful bug being fixed by it? Also it's not clear to me the Licensing terms apply.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've seen semi-legitimate patches sent to other projects, inspired by the tool.

Although, I haven't used it personally - maybe I will play a bit and then we can revisit. Let's close this for now.

@evelikov evelikov closed this Sep 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants