update #48
update #48
Conversation
Review or Edit in CodeSandboxOpen the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request primarily focuses on code formatting and minor refactoring across multiple files in the project. The changes include adding blank lines for better readability, restructuring complex conditional expressions, and adjusting indentation. There are no significant functional changes or new features introduced. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance code readability and organization across multiple files in the project. Formatting adjustments include adding blank lines before attribute declarations and consolidating multi-line expressions into single lines. These cosmetic changes improve clarity without altering the underlying functionality or logic of the code, maintaining the performance and behavior of the models and utilities within the codebase. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ModelArguments
participant DataArguments
participant Trainer
User->>Trainer: Start Training
Trainer->>ModelArguments: Configure model settings
Trainer->>DataArguments: Set up data processing
Trainer->>User: Training in progress
User->>Trainer: Request status
Trainer->>User: Provide updates
User->>Trainer: End Training
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @FortiShield - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (11)
- gptdb_hub/configs/data_args.py (2 hunks)
- gptdb_hub/configs/model_args.py (4 hunks)
- gptdb_hub/data_process/data_utils.py (1 hunks)
- gptdb_hub/eval/evaluation.py (1 hunks)
- gptdb_hub/eval/evaluation_bird.py (1 hunks)
- gptdb_hub/llm_base/chat_model.py (1 hunks)
- gptdb_hub/llm_base/config_parser.py (1 hunks)
- gptdb_hub/llm_base/loggings.py (1 hunks)
- gptdb_hub/llm_base/model_trainer.py (1 hunks)
- gptdb_hub/train/sft_train.py (2 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- gptdb_hub/configs/data_args.py
- gptdb_hub/configs/model_args.py
- gptdb_hub/data_process/data_utils.py
- gptdb_hub/eval/evaluation.py
- gptdb_hub/eval/evaluation_bird.py
- gptdb_hub/llm_base/chat_model.py
- gptdb_hub/llm_base/config_parser.py
- gptdb_hub/llm_base/loggings.py
- gptdb_hub/llm_base/model_trainer.py
- gptdb_hub/train/sft_train.py
Additional comments not posted (7)
pyproject.toml (7)
42-42: Verify impact ofblackupdate on code formatting.The version of
blackhas been updated from23.11.0to24. Ensure that this update does not introduce any unexpected formatting changes in your codebase.
37-37: Verify compatibility ofsqlparseupdate.The version of
sqlparsehas been updated from0.4.4to0.5.0. Ensure that the new version is compatible with your codebase and check for any breaking changes or new features.
54-54: Verify compatibility ofnvidia-cusolver-cu12update.The version of
nvidia-cusolver-cu12has been updated from11.4.5.107to11.6.4.38. Ensure that this update is compatible with your CUDA-related operations and check for any performance improvements or bug fixes.
51-51: Verify compatibility ofnvidia-cublas-cu12update.The version of
nvidia-cublas-cu12has been updated from12.1.3.1to12.6.0.22. Ensure that this update is compatible with your CUDA-related operations and check for any performance improvements or bug fixes.
52-52: Verify compatibility ofnvidia-cufft-cu12update.The version of
nvidia-cufft-cu12has been updated from11.0.2.54to11.2.6.28. Ensure that this update is compatible with your CUDA-related operations and check for any performance improvements or bug fixes.
48-48: Verify compatibility ofnvidia-cuda-runtime-cu12update.The version of
nvidia-cuda-runtime-cu12has been updated from12.1.105to12.6.37. Ensure that this update is compatible with your CUDA-related operations and check for any performance improvements or bug fixes.
47-47: Verify compatibility ofnvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12update.The version of
nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12has been updated from12.1.105to12.6.20. Ensure that this update is compatible with your CUDA-related operations and check for any performance improvements or bug fixes.
Addresses issue: #
Changes proposed in this pull request:
Summary by Sourcery
Refactor code formatting across various modules to enhance readability and maintain consistency in style.
Enhancements:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores