Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing PowerLaw #121

Conversation

xuyuon
Copy link
Contributor

@xuyuon xuyuon commented Aug 1, 2024

…m-class-from-prior-class

no nans now, but the code can be consolidate

xuyuon added 14 commits July 31, 2024 09:50
…prior-class' into 98-moving-naming-tracking-into-jim-class-from-prior-class
…ss' into 98-moving-naming-tracking-into-jim-class-from-prior-class
…m-class-from-prior-class

no nans now, but the code can be consolidate
…ming-tracking-into-jim-class-from-prior-class

Revert "Fixed PowerLaw prior"
…prior-class' into 98-moving-naming-tracking-into-jim-class-from-prior-class
@kazewong kazewong force-pushed the 98-moving-naming-tracking-into-jim-class-from-prior-class branch from 0acb87c to 47af9cf Compare August 1, 2024 18:59
@xuyuon xuyuon changed the title Merge pull request #1 from kazewong/98-moving-naming-tracking-into-ji… Fixing PowerLaw Aug 1, 2024
@kazewong kazewong self-requested a review August 1, 2024 20:48
Copy link
Owner

@kazewong kazewong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, can merge now

@xuyuon
Copy link
Contributor Author

xuyuon commented Aug 2, 2024

Fixed all tests in test_prior.py. Unit tests are working properly now.

@kazewong kazewong merged commit 957335e into kazewong:98-moving-naming-tracking-into-jim-class-from-prior-class Aug 2, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants