DNM | WIP: PoC of sticky IPs for Kubernetes entities #377
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
This is a proof of concept of implementing sticky IP allocations for whereabouts.
Any interested party can use whereabouts to have persistent IP allocations across their workload lifecycle - e.g. KubeVirt VMs.
You indicate this whereabouts build you want to have persistent IPs for a certain allocation by specifying which enitity owns the allocation - in our case, the allocations are asked for a KubeVirt VM. Thus, the pod must be templated w/ the required CNI args:
We are using the
OverlappingRangeIPReservation
to block the IP allocations (it is its purpose at the end of the day ...) but the "real" proposal will probably add a new CRD for the same function.Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer (optional):