Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing "Open..." file menu #7385

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

Add missing "Open..." file menu #7385

merged 8 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

martinRenou
Copy link
Member

Since Notebook 7, the Open... menu disappeared, this PR brings it back.

Notebook <=6 behavior:
https://github.com/jupyter/notebook/assets/21197331/89f09978-3338-4d3f-a913-592dceab9d92

Notebook 7 with this PR:
https://github.com/jupyter/notebook/assets/21197331/4acc8da0-c351-4118-9ac4-38b0bb4d1fe9

Copy link
Contributor

Binder 👈 Launch a Binder on branch martinRenou/notebook/open_menu

@martinRenou
Copy link
Member Author

martinRenou commented May 30, 2024

Bot update playwright snapshots!

@martinRenou
Copy link
Member Author

Trigger CI

@martinRenou martinRenou reopened this May 30, 2024
@jtpio jtpio added this to the 7.3.0 milestone May 30, 2024
@jtpio
Copy link
Member

jtpio commented May 30, 2024

These workflow failures (cancelled) are also happening on other PRs, and pass after restarting them, not sure why:

image

@jtpio
Copy link
Member

jtpio commented May 31, 2024

As mentioned above in #7385 (review), we probably need to revert the snapshot update related to the flaky test.

Copy link
Member

@jtpio jtpio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@jtpio jtpio merged commit 1a03b9d into jupyter:main May 31, 2024
30 of 31 checks passed
@martinRenou martinRenou deleted the open_menu branch May 31, 2024 13:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants