-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: improve document about settings #248
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I'm not a native English speaker, so maybe it could be better expressed. |
Ditto :) |
@@ -105,13 +105,14 @@ Note that when using insecure context StreamSaver will navigate to the download | |||
|
|||
# Configuration | |||
|
|||
By default, `https://jimmywarting.github.io/StreamSaver.js/mitm.html?version=2.0.0` will be used to create the iframe in secure context. But it could be unavailable when using Firefox or an environment where `github.io` can not be accessed, then you need to config a custom `mitm.html` by yourself. | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not believe it is a specific Firefox issue?
I think it's more about 3th party cookie restrictions
you see, if you disable 3th party cookies in chrome or in safari then jimmywarting.github.io/StreamSaver.js/mitm.html won't work either...
It's should say something like:
StreamSaver uses a 3th party service to install a service worker on an external domain (hidden in a iframe). This can sometimes be restricted by disabling 3th party cookies in your browser. To get around this issue it's best to self-host the service worker and replace
streamSaver.mitm
to your own domain.
Toughts?
It may also be a problem in incognito mode where things are more private
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems #242 is not mentioned in the new sentence?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unrelated, but... My https://github.com/jimmywarting/native-file-system-adapter works a bit differently... same concept doe... but it communicates with service workers directly without a mitm or any hidden iframes or will use the native file system access window.showSaveFilePicker
you are more required to self host the service worker yourself
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean my words or an environment where `github.io` can not be accessed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a setting for communicating with service worker directly instead of via a iframe could also be preferred.
I didn't know we can skip mimt even. 😂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will use the native file system access window.showSaveFilePicker
Yeah, I'm also doing this myself.
close #242
close #247