-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 561
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: rewrite API first guide with detailed implementation and samples #1335
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
docs: rewrite API first guide with detailed implementation and samples #1335
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for jhipster-site ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Both plugins have been retired by Apache Maven. See: https://maven.apache.org/plugins/#retired for more details. Both plugins have not see updates in almost a decade (IDEA was last updated in 2013). The mention and use of the plugins has been removed from the Doing API First Development guide in jhipster/jhipster.github.io#1335. Closes jhipster#25081
@mraible see above deployment and attempt navigation to the proposed changes in Options > Doing API First Development. The redirect is broken an in an infinite loop. See also the issue and this comment for more context, jhipster/generator-jhipster#25030 (comment). I'm alerting you because I just found this in the Netlify deployment checks... you or somebody on the team may wish to look into the redirect looping. |
Does it work when you run it locally? I've seen this happen with other pages, but I'm not sure how to fix it.
|
I haven't went that far yet... but I'll try today, time permitting. Thanks for looking! Sorry to pick on you... but I saw your name "Matt Raible's Team" and decided it was worth a tag. |
Moving the conversation from the jhipster/generator-jhipster#25030. Basically a full rewrite of the API First document with sample files, consistent examples, and explanations for new comers. Includes configuration of the plugins and sample code showing full context. Removed references to retired tooling, see jhipster/generator-jhipster#25081 (merged). Added authentication tips (and a couple of Pro Tips). Since the Netlify deployment doesn't work, the edits can be reviewed in context here. |
@mraible @atomfrede who watches and reviews these JHipster.tech PRs? Anyone I should tag? |
Hi @timothystone-knsl I'm currently on vacation and don't have time to review. It's possible I will in the coming weeks. |
Sorry @timothystone-knsl I wanted to have a look. Will try it this week. |
I too just returned from vacation. Just poking this PR. |
@mraible @atomfrede I'm still interested in making this guide more approachable and removing what I see as assumption gaps in the existing guide. One thing I need to resolve and it's not obvious to me is that the OpenAPI Generator as configured to In the guide (blob link), it is explicitly called out:
This may be true, but the generated code does not resolve this "provided How can I help close this gap and provide the necessary tips or instructions for new users of JHipster in "providing the bean" properly? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome work @timothystone-knsl. It really reads great.
What is the issue with the nativeWebRequets and the IDE? When it comes to delegate use, this could be changed if we agree its not needed. At least in my projects (not jhipster ones) we have always used delegates as far as I remember. |
I don't have a real issue with the use of the delegate pattern. Where the discussion occurs it is around preferences and is mostly a question for me of: is JHipster providing the pattern as an example of best practice or if In IntelliJ, one will often see this: It doesn't seem to impact anything... at least casually, but I've been asked about it and don't have an answer. My Spring experience has its own gaps and I have not been able to resolve this myself. It feels as if the OpenAPI generator is not doing something and there is a gap in the documentation that can address it. |
Good point. I really can not recall any explicit decision for delagate pattern. If we do not have one we should adhere to our policy to use technologies with their default config (when possible) |
On that, the following would need to be changed or removed in the generator. See also the documentation for the Spring Generator defaults. If there as simple Spring configuration fix that would address the "missing bean" in the IDE, whether a PR in the OpenAPI plugin or in the |
@timothystone-knsl I don't know much about this as I haven't used this feature. A PR would be most welcome if it makes things better. |
Re-ordered concepts to introduce concepts provided by JHipster with details on the out of the box configuration of the openapi-generator and the use of the Delegate Pattern. Explicitly callout the use of the OAI's Pet Store example with links to samples. Added notes on JHipster's technical structure and the use of ArchUnit to prepare the reader for the implementation of the API operations. Rewrite and editdocs for a detailed introduction of API first development NOTE: removed references to the Maven IDEA and Eclipse plugins. Both have been retired and should be removed from JHipster. Added detailed examples of the implementation of NativeWebRequest and responses Lots of examples and details added to both the basic and detailed implementation with mock request responses prior to implementation with the NativeWebRequest. Add sample api.yml used in guide and build out initial content The content is largely complete and ready for review. Add links and the sample api.yml document used throughout the guide.
JHipster defaults the `/api/**` behind authentication via the SecurityConfigurationFilter chain, e.g., `.authenticated()`. It is possible to craft a JWT Bearer token to test the API using the JWT Secret generated by JHipster during creation.
Test the desired URL to help Jekyll with redirects
Update docs to reflect OpenAPI implementation recommendation.
The openapi-client subgenerator is no longer maintained after v8. ```shell % jhipster openapi-client WARNING! Since JHipster v8, the jhipster command will not use the locally installed generator-jhipster. If you want to execute the locally installed generator-jhipster, run: npx jhipster FATAL! This sub-generator is no longer maintained and has been removed from JHipster starting from v8. If you are interested in maintaining this sub-generator fill a feature request on the JHipster bug tracker. ```
1047a54
to
1264fb9
Compare
Updated, removing the old note on using I might ask a separate question: why have the option in |
Generically state the configuration of the project for API First tooling and link to the OpenAPI Generator page for more information.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just minor things I noticed. Besides that the overall structure and content is really nice. It will provide a great starting point for people that have never use openapi generator before.
pages/doing_api_first_development.md
Outdated
└── PetsApiDelegate.java | ||
``` | ||
|
||
> ⚠️The OpenAPI Generator is responsible for the creation of DTOs ("models") and delegates. Implementations MUST not be placed in the `target/generated-sources`. These classes are subject to generation at anytime and SHOULD NOT be committed to source control. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confusing, MUST not be place in target
and should not be comitted to source control. Do you mean MUST be placed in target/generatedSources
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"MUST NOT"... Implementations should be put into the src/main/java
(project.build.sourceDirectory
) and the appropriate path to meet the technical structure tests.
The target
(project.build.directory
) should be considered "ephemeral" and is deleted when running mvn clean
. If the implementation code is put in the target
directory, it has to be restored, i.e., git co target/...
or something similar any time the clean lifecycle is run. And that means one has to commit this ephemeral code. 🫣 Running mvn clean
might be performed fairly often as the generator is bound to the generate-sources
phase of the default lifecycle and does not overwrite existing generated classes from the OpenAPI Specification ("swagger") document, api.yml
.
Since implementation code would be part of the project, one would not want it deleted every time the plugin needs to update the generated source.
We updated the website with a new design. Can you please update this issue accordingly? |
Absolutely, working on it. One outstanding question may need to be revisited soon: is |
…i-first Merge new website content and resolve conflicts.
@mraible done. |
@mraible hold. reorganization of files broke a link in the guide to the sample Do you want this branched squashed, or will you do it on merge? |
Linking static file for reference.
Following Docusaurus documentation. Create a directory in /static/<reference-file>/path Update path.
bd6b662
to
163f42b
Compare
I usually squash and merge. But you're welcome to do it in advance if you like. |
You have the conn sir! |
@atomfrede @DanielFran any strong opinion on the use of the delegate pattern over the default of the openapi-generator-maven-plugin? This guide could be easily reworked. |
No strong opinion. For me the delegate pattern is fine as I used it myself a lot with the generator. |
Ditto. Mostly because the default is to use it. However, I have found that testing the implementation classes is not well documented. Do you have examples @atomfrede you can share or point to in OSS? There could be a lot of value in this document for a "Testing" section.; Update I have some, but mine are minimal: to pass Sonar. And I can never seem get them to use the implementation properly. Inexperience? Documentation misunderstanding? Either way, it's a bit of a gap in the documentation. I wouldn't ask otherwise, but my Google-fu is not up to the task. :/ |
I've got some more work in this guide I think. The original guide made no mention on how to use the DTOs generated by the OpenAPI specification and the repositories. Using JDL in conjunction with API-first development is largely incompatible. OpenAPI generates the Delegate and Controllers along side the DTOs. But the Mappers and Services are not. I'm looking at the configuration of the openapi-generator-maven-plugin options, but not finding the support out of the box. If I use JDL, for example:
This generates the accompanying services, resources, mappers, repositories, &tc. If I want to really defer to the generator, I think I need to add information on creating the services and mappers leaving the DTOs to the generator. Have any of the reviewers dived into this with the guide as is? |
@mraible @atomfrede I think I sorted it out. I'll move the effort to another PR and issue so as to close this thread and merge this to the docs. API first development means something specific Please let me know if anything here is incorrectly using JHipster JDL to achieve the goal of API First development. IMHO, for true contract first development—as provided by the Maven plugin and the OpenAPI Specification—one will have to turn off and turn on some behaviors in the JDL to defer to the openapi-generator-maven-plugin. The plugin will perform some specific things in conflict with JHipster's default behaviors. At the very least, the plugin in will:
However, the openapi-generator-maven-plugin is NOT going to generate the MapStruct mappers and service classes. This is not documented. I achieved my understanding of API First development with the following JDL:
This will leave the Delegate Implementation largely on the developer. Because Furthermore, the following should be noted:
I'll get a demo project set up soon with the new PR. |
I haven't abandoned this PR. I think this PR is still valuable, but I think the topic needs a larger rewrite with support in JHipster evaluated (see jhipster/generator-jhipster#27215). It's been approved. Just needs a merge? |
Re-ordered concepts to introduce concepts provided by JHipster with details on the out of the box configuration of the openapi-generator and the use of the Delegate Pattern. Explicitly callout the use of the OAI's Pet Store example with links to samples.
Added notes on JHipster's technical structure and the use of ArchUnit to prepare the reader for the implementation of the API operations.
Rewrite and editdocs for a detailed introduction of API first development
NOTE: removed references to the Maven IDEA and Eclipse plugins. Both have been retired and should be removed from JHipster.
Added detailed examples of the implementation of NativeWebRequest and responses
Lots of examples and details added to both the basic and detailed implementation with mock request responses prior to implementation with the NativeWebRequest.
Add sample api.yml used in guide and build out initial content
The content is largely complete and ready for review. Add links and the sample api.yml document used throughout the guide.
Closes jhipster/generator-jhipster#25030