Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

switching to xml parsing for better handling of animation #2

Open
wants to merge 32 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hvfrancesco
Copy link
Contributor

hello Jarno,
I'm suggesting quite a radical change: I've introduced the use of xml.etree for svg parsing and handling.
It allows to get rid of footer module, and now animation frames are rendered as Inkscape layers inside a single file, making cleaner and easier postprocessing and management.
what do you think about it?

best, francesco

@hvfrancesco
Copy link
Contributor Author

got rid of svg_header.py too. Now all 3 remaining modules can write a SVG header if they find it is not already existing.
Having just the actual 'rendering' modules make workflow faster and simpler imo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant