You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have done a genome assembly of a bacterium based on Oxford Nanopore data. The assembly looks very good overall, but I have one region where I want to confirm the assembly via mapping the longest 20% of the ONP reads back to the assembly.
The problem is that this region is very repetitive. I guess you could call it long tandem repeats of several hundred base pairs.
I think the assembly is correct, but graphmap is probably having trouble there. To me it looks like it is finding a seed on one particular repeat region of the refercence but the correct position would actually be shifted one/some repeat(s) left/right. Then the extension works but is "out of phase" in terms of repeats. When I have a look at the repeats on IGV I have insertions an deletions all about the same size (probably corresponding to the length of the tandem repeat).
The reason why I think that the assembly is correct is because I have about 30 to 40% of the long reads spanning the region correctly without any long indel.
How can I tweak the parameters of graphmap to avoid this problem?
Or do you think my hypothesis is wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have done a genome assembly of a bacterium based on Oxford Nanopore data. The assembly looks very good overall, but I have one region where I want to confirm the assembly via mapping the longest 20% of the ONP reads back to the assembly.
The problem is that this region is very repetitive. I guess you could call it long tandem repeats of several hundred base pairs.
I think the assembly is correct, but graphmap is probably having trouble there. To me it looks like it is finding a seed on one particular repeat region of the refercence but the correct position would actually be shifted one/some repeat(s) left/right. Then the extension works but is "out of phase" in terms of repeats. When I have a look at the repeats on IGV I have insertions an deletions all about the same size (probably corresponding to the length of the tandem repeat).
The reason why I think that the assembly is correct is because I have about 30 to 40% of the long reads spanning the region correctly without any long indel.
How can I tweak the parameters of graphmap to avoid this problem?
Or do you think my hypothesis is wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: