feat: add v4 upgrade plan #2982
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces version 400 of the upgrade module to the application. A new file Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant App as Application
participant Router as Upgrade Router
participant V400 as V400 Upgrade Handler
App->>Router: Register Upgrades
Router->>V400: Register V400 Upgrade
V400-->>Router: Upgrade Registered
Router-->>App: Upgrade Router Configured
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/upgrade.go (1)
19-20: Consider additional documentation for major version upgradeAs this is a major version upgrade (v4.0.0), please ensure:
- Upgrade documentation is updated with breaking changes
- Migration guide is provided for node operators
- Upgrade procedure is tested on a testnet first
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/upgrade.go(1 hunks)app/upgrades/v400/upgrades.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
app/upgrades/v400/upgrades.go (3)
1-13: LGTM! Package structure and imports are well organized.
The imports include all necessary Cosmos SDK dependencies and follow standard practices.
14-19: Verify if store upgrades are needed for v4.0.0
The StoreUpgrades field is empty. Please verify if this upgrade requires any store migrations.
Let's check for any store-related changes in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the search results to verify if store upgrades are needed for v4.0.0.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Empty StoreUpgrades is correct for v4.0.0
The empty StoreUpgrades is intentional as v4.0.0 upgrade does not require any store migrations. The upgrade handler is defined but no stores need to be added, deleted, renamed, or modified.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for store-related changes or migrations
rg -g '!{vendor,build}/*' -A 5 'store|migration|upgrade.*v4'
Length of output: 72711
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for v4.0.0 upgrade changes and store migrations
rg -g '!{vendor,build}/*' -A 5 'v4.0.0|v400' app/upgrades/
Length of output: 670
21-31: Verify if additional migration logic is needed
The upgrade handler only runs standard module migrations without any custom logic. Please confirm if v4.0.0 requires any specific state migrations or parameter changes.
Let's check for any migration-related changes in the codebase:
app/upgrade.go (2)
12-12: LGTM! Import follows established pattern.
The v400 package import is correctly placed with other version imports.
19-20: Verify upgrade version sequence
The upgrade router registration follows the correct sequence (v200 -> v210 -> v300 -> v400). Please ensure there are no skipped versions between v300 and v400.
Let's check the version history:
✅ Verification successful
Upgrade sequence is correct - no missing versions
Based on the codebase analysis, the upgrade sequence is properly maintained:
- v200 ("v2.0")
- v210 ("v2.1")
- v300 ("v3")
- v400 ("v4.0.0")
The sequence is continuous without any missing intermediate versions between v300 and v400. This is confirmed by:
- The upgrade router registration in
app/upgrade.go - The presence of exactly these version directories in
app/upgrades/ - The upgrade definitions in each version's
upgrades.gofile
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any intermediate versions between v300 and v400
fd -g 'app/upgrades/v[3-4]*/upgrades.go' --exec grep -l 'UpgradeName'
# Check git history for version patterns
git log --oneline | grep -E 'v[3-4][0-9]{2}'
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find upgrade-related files and their content
fd -g 'v[3-4]*' -t d app/upgrades
# Also search for any upgrade-related constants or version definitions
rg -l "v[3-4]00" app/
rg "const.*[Uu]pgrade.*[Vv]ersion|UpgradeName.*v[3-4]" app/
Length of output: 422
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the upgrade files to understand the version sequence
cat app/upgrades/v300/upgrades.go app/upgrades/v400/upgrades.go
# Also check if there are any other upgrade-related files we might have missed
fd -g '*upgrade*.go' --exec echo "=== {}" \; --exec cat {}
Length of output: 15802
Closed: #2955
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes