Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use older glibc for linux builds #145

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

remorses
Copy link

@remorses remorses commented Jan 3, 2025

Fix #22
Fix #22

These are the new GLIBC version requirements for the binary:

GLIBC version requirements:
    0x09691a75 0x00 20 GLIBC_2.2.5
    0x09691a75 0x00 14 GLIBC_2.2.5
    0x0d696913 0x00 13 GLIBC_2.3
    0x06969192 0x00 10 GLIBC_2.12
    0x09691a75 0x00 07 GLIBC_2.2.5
    0x06969187 0x00 05 GLIBC_2.27
    0x09691a75 0x00 04 GLIBC_2.2.5
    0x06969194 0x00 21 GLIBC_2.14
    0x06969188 0x00 19 GLIBC_2.28
    0x09691974 0x00 17 GLIBC_2.3.4
    0x06969185 0x00 15 GLIBC_2.25
    0x0d696913 0x00 12 GLIBC_2.3
    0x06969198 0x00 11 GLIBC_2.18
    0x09691a75 0x00 02 GLIBC_2.2.5

As you can see now the minimum one is GLIBC_2.3.4, which is much lower than GLIBC_2.35

I opened this PR because i could not deploy on Vercel, which still uses GLIBC_2.34 I think

@remorses
Copy link
Author

remorses commented Jan 3, 2025

By the way now Github Actions should support linux ARM, so it should be possible to migrate the scripts to the Github Actions CI: https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/arm64-on-github-actions-powering-faster-more-efficient-build-systems/

@remorses
Copy link
Author

remorses commented Jan 3, 2025

Just noticed #144, bad timing 😂

@remorses remorses closed this Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GLIBC_2.35 not found
1 participant