Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dpvs session synchronization #476

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

weiyanhua100
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

option. In this mode, dest addr is needed in FDIR instead of dest addr and dest port mask.

NOTICE:
number of laddrs should be greater or equal to number of slave lcores.
Or, some slave lcores will have no laddr causing FNAT fowarding failed in
those slave lcores.

Co-authored-by: kldeng <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: lixiaoxiao <[email protected]>
doc/tutorial.md Show resolved Hide resolved
include/ipvs/conn.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/ipvs/ip_vs_sync_msg.c Show resolved Hide resolved
src/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
kldeng and others added 3 commits September 23, 2019 20:56
…o the DPVS node failure in the cluster.

1.there are two synchronization modes: full and incremental.
2.incremental synchronization is used for new session.
3.full synchronization is used for existing session.

Co-authored-by: lixiaoxiao [email protected]
@hulinfan
Copy link

hulinfan commented Sep 30, 2019

Hi,
Have you ever tested the performance of dpvs while enabling sessions synchronization?
What's the PPS and CPS?
I doubt it harms performance a lot.

@ywc689 ywc689 added pr/to-confirm-needs consider whether the feature of pr is needed pr/needs-confirmed the feature in the pr is what we need,and list what cases should be checked in later stages pr/to-review-codes review codes line by line and check if problem exists. and removed pr/to-confirm-needs consider whether the feature of pr is needed labels Jul 16, 2020
@yfming
Copy link
Contributor

yfming commented Feb 17, 2022

你好,看了代码后有几个疑问:
1、需要同步session的机器运行ipvsadm --conn-sync命令?假如a执行了这个命令,这时候b和c同时收到了probe报文,都回应了reply怎么确定应该从c还是b同步呢?假如c同时收到了a和b的probe报文,那怎么能给两台都同步全量呢?
2、需要同步的机器都要执行一下ipvsadm --conn-sync才会做全量和增量同步吧?
3、同步后的conn为什么不能用lport添加fdir,必须要支持lip方式呢?
4、session建立之后为什么要等待(sync_session_elapse),然后才进行同步呢?

@ywc689 ywc689 removed the pr/to-review-codes review codes line by line and check if problem exists. label Feb 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr/needs-confirmed the feature in the pr is what we need,and list what cases should be checked in later stages
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants