-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gateways: document Content-Location #471
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
09d808b
http gateway: document Content-Location
hacdias 209783a
gateway: clarify SHOULDs for content-location
lidel 11100a7
gateway: explicit should for trustless clients
lidel b94f597
gateway: car-* request query parameters
hacdias 1defdd3
gateway: car params and Content-Location
lidel ca46f40
Merge pull request #472 from ipfs/gateway-car-parms
hacdias File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hacdias I've added these clarifications as SHOULDs, the goal here is to push everyone towards including explicit
?format
in requests – haves a lot of headache in debugging interop/caching problems.We've always been doing this internally (including both
format
andAccept
), this writes it down as suggested practice.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it problematic then that some information in accept headers cannot be expressed in the format parameters (e.g. dfs, duplicates and version for CARs)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potentially, could cause issues at some point in the future when a single gateway supports something more than "the Kubo default" and clients actually request non-default CAR variant, including custom implementations with edge cases like #431.
That is why, to avoid cache override problems in the future, we revised position on these, add
car-*
URL params in #472. This allows us to explicitly list them inContent-Location
when non-default CAR was requested (code for rainbow in ipfs/boxo#603)