-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[uss_qualifier/netrid/dss/isa_simple] Refactor and complete create case #204
Merged
BenjaminPelletier
merged 12 commits into
interuss:main
from
Orbitalize:dss0030-isasimple-create-refactor
Sep 22, 2023
Merged
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6f9141a
[uss_qualifier/netrid/dss/isa_simple] Refactor and complete create case
mickmis a8b1a85
add v19 ISASimple
mickmis 295d592
[uss_qualifier/scenarios/documentation] Allow additional checks when …
mickmis 4bad65d
Merge branch 'linked-steps-add-checks' into dss0030-isasimple-create-…
mickmis cbf1ac5
move back checks as part of DSSWrapper
mickmis ad8a00d
fixes following review
mickmis 2b5f3db
Merge remote-tracking branch 'interuss/main' into dss0030-isasimple-c…
mickmis 16f054e
update submodules and uas_standards
mickmis 1091de6
[uss_qualifier/scenarios/aggregate_checks] Convert unattributed queri…
mickmis 24221fa
Merge branch 'main' into dss0030-isasimple-create-refactor
mickmis 534457b
DSS interop: put back record fail in check
mickmis a38e8ba
cleanups
mickmis File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a particular benefit to using a polygon rather than a bounding box?
(I can think of a few: I was just wondering what the benefit is regarding to the tests we do)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes my implementation life easier, and the resource more flexible (notably it would be nice to use it in the DSS interoperability scenario, where specifying the polygon would be needed)