[uss_qualifier] Validate that some queries to service_providers are properly authenticated for NET0210

[Shastick]

Add check for NET0210, which is about checking that service providers correctly authenticate requests.

This is done via a new misbehavior scenario that will inject flight data and query the SP's endpoint for that data without providing credentials.

It behaves very similarly to the nominal_behavior scenario, with these two tweaks:

• a DSS instance is required instead of being optional
• the polling stops as soon as we have validated that the SP properly authenticates the flights and flight_details requests.

[Shastick]

Note that server_id should be set here once #188 is merged

[BenjaminPelletier]

Thanks, this looks great -- just the propagated pre-existing issue regarding RIDVersion and I expect this PR to be ready to merge

[Shastick]

Unsure if this is flaky or due to interfering tests, but I ran into multiple of these failures on the CI:

2023-09-12 20:15:38.239 | WARNING  | monitoring.uss_qualifier.suites.suite:_print_failed_check:50 - New failed check:
  details: 'Flight be73f2ee-528f-4d8d-8725-eb0de98d544a: has no telemetry position that
    belong to a cluster.
  
    Severity Medium upgraded to Critical because USS_QUALIFIER_STOP_FAST environment
    variable indicates true'
  documentation_url: https://github.com/interuss/monitoring/blob/889863e731c55d197ddb13c9d2d7faf3779a3cf0/monitoring/uss_qualifier/scenarios/astm/netrid/v19/nominal_behavior.md#individual-flights-obfuscation-check
  name: Individual flights obfuscation
  participants:
  - uss3
  requirements:
  - astm.f3411.v19.NET0490
  severity: Critical
  summary: Error while evaluating obfuscation of individual flights. Flight was outside
    of all clusters.
  timestamp: '2023-09-12T20:15:38.237596Z'

Will have a look tomorrow.

[BenjaminPelletier]

Unsure if this is flaky or due to interfering tests, but I ran into multiple of these failures on the CI:
...
Will have a look tomorrow.

I think this is likely to be #144 and if so should be transient -- I'd poke @mickmis next week. It looks like the CI is passing now.

[BenjaminPelletier]

Since dss_pool requires at least one instance below, this argument shouldn't default to None. But we can clean that up later.