Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency puma to v6.4.2 [SECURITY] - autoclosed #105

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 8, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
puma 6.4.0 -> 6.4.2 age adoption passing confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2024-21647

Impact

Prior to versions 6.4.2 and 5.6.8, puma exhibited dangerous behavior when parsing chunked transfer encoding bodies.

Fixed versions limit the size of chunk extensions. Without this limit, an attacker could cause unbounded resource (CPU, network bandwidth) consumption.

Patches

The vulnerability has been fixed in 6.4.2 and 5.6.8.

Workarounds

No known workarounds.

References


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies label Jan 8, 2024
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency puma to v6.4.2 [SECURITY] Update dependency puma to v6.4.2 [SECURITY] - autoclosed Jan 30, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Jan 30, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/rubygems-puma-vulnerability branch January 30, 2024 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants