Add microbenchmark for A@B^t #2408
Merged
+303
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Egor-Krivov
changed the title
alexbaden
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The benchmark implementation looks fine. One note - this example is almost identical to our tutorial 10 experimental block pointer code, with some small changes to handle the transpose case and a user provided bias vector. We might be able to unify this microbenchmark with tutorial 10 in the future.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR adds microbenchmark for gemm with A@B^t, which closes #2414