-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 886
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ChatMarkersManager improved - part 2 #272
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
ChatMarkersManager improved - part 2 #272
Conversation
miguelhincapie
commented
Oct 4, 2018
- Filters modified to allow xep-0333 be used in MUC.
- Validation when trying to obtain Chat instance.
- Created a method to notify the recipients about new state.
* Filters modified to allow xep-0333 be used in MUC. * Validation when trying to obtain Chat instance. * Created a method to notify the recipients about new state.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you again for your contributions 👍
I found some things that can be improved :)
smack-experimental/src/main/java/org/jivesoftware/smackx/chat_markers/ChatMarkersManager.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
smack-experimental/src/main/java/org/jivesoftware/smackx/chat_markers/ChatMarkersManager.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
smack-experimental/src/main/java/org/jivesoftware/smackx/chat_markers/ChatMarkersManager.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This pull request has been mentioned on Ignite Realtime Community Forums. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.igniterealtime.org/t/chat-markers-support-in-smack-xep-0333/73202/16 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that the big merge happened, I have some time to work on the pending PRs, starting with yours. :)
Please find my comments inline.
smack-experimental/src/main/java/org/jivesoftware/smackx/chat_markers/ChatMarkersManager.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
smack-experimental/src/main/java/org/jivesoftware/smackx/chat_markers/ChatMarkersManager.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
* @throws InterruptedException if the connection is interrupted. | ||
* @throws IllegalStateException if one of the params don't match the rules. | ||
*/ | ||
public void markMessage(Message message, ChatMarkersState chatMarkersState, String messageId) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would expect that the user gives as a message with a markable extension to such a method. Then you could remove the ChatMarkersState
and String
(messageId
) parameters, which would make the method much more user friendly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but the user would need to deal with message.addExtension(new ChatMarkersElements.ReceivedExtension(messageId));
by himself, in other words he would doing some of the job that this class has to do.
What I want is class that can be used almost out of the box but of course knowing how the XEP works.