-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different key funder job name #3506
Conversation
|
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3506 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 0.00% 0.00%
=====================================
Files 1 1
Lines 16 16
=====================================
Misses 16 16
|
… trevor/different-key-funder-job-name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did a bit of reading, the grouping key must default to the job name or something. It's so poorly documented
### Description - My changes in #3491 / #3492 were kind of accurate - according to prometheus/pushgateway#65 even using pushAdd will displace existing metrics. It's all very confusing! - I tested this with a script that pushed some test metrics to the push gateway - basically by having the key funder use a different job name than the mainnet2 one, the metrics each of them push won't conflict with one another ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests -->
### Description - My changes in hyperlane-xyz#3491 / hyperlane-xyz#3492 were kind of accurate - according to prometheus/pushgateway#65 even using pushAdd will displace existing metrics. It's all very confusing! - I tested this with a script that pushed some test metrics to the push gateway - basically by having the key funder use a different job name than the mainnet2 one, the metrics each of them push won't conflict with one another ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests -->
Description
Drive-by changes
Related issues
Backward compatibility
Testing