Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different key funder job name #3506

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tkporter
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Drive-by changes

Related issues

Backward compatibility

Testing

@tkporter tkporter requested a review from nambrot as a code owner March 28, 2024 10:44
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 28, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7d43925

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #3506 (7d43925) into main (2093fe4) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #3506   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files          1       1           
  Lines         16      16           
=====================================
  Misses        16      16           
Components Coverage Δ
core ∅ <ø> (∅)
hooks ∅ <ø> (∅)
isms ∅ <ø> (∅)
token ∅ <ø> (∅)
middlewares ∅ <ø> (∅)

Copy link
Contributor

@daniel-savu daniel-savu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did a bit of reading, the grouping key must default to the job name or something. It's so poorly documented

@tkporter tkporter merged commit 9b06f3b into main Apr 2, 2024
34 of 35 checks passed
@tkporter tkporter deleted the trevor/different-key-funder-job-name branch April 2, 2024 10:56
yorhodes pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
### Description

- My changes in #3491 / #3492 were kind of accurate - according to
prometheus/pushgateway#65 even using pushAdd
will displace existing metrics. It's all very confusing!
- I tested this with a script that pushed some test metrics to the push
gateway - basically by having the key funder use a different job name
than the mainnet2 one, the metrics each of them push won't conflict with
one another

### Drive-by changes

<!--
Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included?
-->

### Related issues

<!--
- Fixes #[issue number here]
-->

### Backward compatibility

<!--
Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure
implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits
using this infra tooling?

Yes/No
-->

### Testing

<!--
What kind of testing have these changes undergone?

None/Manual/Unit Tests
-->
letonchanh pushed a commit to letonchanh/hyperlane-monorepo that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
### Description

- My changes in hyperlane-xyz#3491 / hyperlane-xyz#3492 were kind of accurate - according to
prometheus/pushgateway#65 even using pushAdd
will displace existing metrics. It's all very confusing!
- I tested this with a script that pushed some test metrics to the push
gateway - basically by having the key funder use a different job name
than the mainnet2 one, the metrics each of them push won't conflict with
one another

### Drive-by changes

<!--
Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included?
-->

### Related issues

<!--
- Fixes #[issue number here]
-->

### Backward compatibility

<!--
Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure
implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits
using this infra tooling?

Yes/No
-->

### Testing

<!--
What kind of testing have these changes undergone?

None/Manual/Unit Tests
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants