Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cosmos cleanup 0 #2876

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

tkporter
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Addresses a handful of issues in #2865

Drive-by changes

Related issues

Backward compatibility

Testing

@tkporter tkporter requested a review from daniel-savu as a code owner October 31, 2023 12:15
message: hex::encode(RawHyperlaneMessage::from(message)),
},
};
let payload = ModulesAndThresholdRequest::new(message);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nicee

pub message: String, // hexbinary
struct ModulesAndThresholdRequestInner {
/// Hex-encoded Hyperlane message
pub message: String,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one of my comments in the big PR is to stop using these strings entirely, curious to hear what you think

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah I like that

@tkporter tkporter merged commit 4583c9c into trevor/new-featv3-cosmos-oct-28 Oct 31, 2023
2 of 4 checks passed
@tkporter tkporter deleted the trevor/cosmos-cleanup-0 branch October 31, 2023 12:39
yorhodes pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
### Description

Addresses a handful of issues in
#2865

### Drive-by changes

<!--
Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included?
-->

### Related issues

<!--
- Fixes #[issue number here]
-->

### Backward compatibility

<!--
Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure
implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits
using this infra tooling?

Yes/No
-->

### Testing

<!--
What kind of testing have these changes undergone?

None/Manual/Unit Tests
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants