Add a draft proposal of requirements. #5
Conversation
|
Great! Thanks, @dajiaji! I'll add several comments inline. PTAL. First, I would like to merge this PR after you check my comments. Then, I would like to suggest several modifications by submitting another PR. |
UseCases.md
Outdated
| - #T.B.D. | ||
| - Network environment: a local network and/or a global network | ||
| - Certificate issuer: public CA / corporate or organizational CA / private CA | ||
| - Privacy scope: public / per service or device manufacturer / private |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can omit this section for now, IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your review. Okay, you can omit the section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dajiaji I've attached several comments inline. Please check these comments and revise your draft if needed.
| - The UA (the web browser mentioned in the use cases above) shall be able to securely discover the presence of HTTPS/WSS server capable devices (hereinafter just called 'device') that are connected to the local network. | ||
| - A secure context loaded from the internet to the UA (hereinafter just called 'secure context') should also be able to discover target device capabilities that are actively (e.g., turned on) connected to the local network (e.g., device type, identity of a set of Web APIs, and so on). | ||
| - A secure context shall be able to get access to the locally discovered device based on the user consent. | ||
| - If there are multiple devices in local network, the UA shall be able to provide the user with a way to select one device at a time which she intends to use on the secure context. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Several questions:
- Should we limit network scope of devices to the same local network?
- Should the UA provide a way to limit devices to ones which has capabilities requested by the users?
- Should the UA avoid exposing the device list to web apps?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we limit network scope of devices to the same local network?
I'd like to focus on the case to simplify our discussion if there isn't anyone who wants to consider more complicated local network environment.
Should the UA provide a way to limit devices to ones which has capabilities requested by the users?
I'm not sure but yes, I think so. We need more discussion but you can add the requirement.
Should the UA avoid exposing the device list to web apps?
Yes. Please add the requirement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay, I'll merge this as it is for now. These items could be discussed later in #4.
UseCases.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ## <a name="req-03"></a>REQ-03: Issuing TLS server certificate for device | ||
|
|
||
| (Are there any solution to realize the use cases above without issuing a TLS server certificate to the device ?) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add "Note:" at the top of the sentence.
UseCases.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| (Are there any solution to realize the use cases above without issuing a TLS server certificate to the device ?) | ||
|
|
||
| - The device must have a way to get a server certificate which the UA can trust after connecting to the local network because an IP address and a domain name of a device in local network is changeable. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/changeable/subject to change/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks. I've modified the draft. Can you please check and merge it ?
|
Thanks for merging it. |
No description provided.