Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 05-histograms.md #70

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

eduardo-rodrigues
Copy link
Member

Trivial rewrite to close #53.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jpivarski jpivarski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This framing reflects my view, at least, of the two libraries. It's possible to use boost-histogram on its own, but without all of the plotting, etc. that hist provides, it's hard to use in a data analysis. I agree that we should lead new users toward hist as an all-in-one toolbox, but ensure that they're aware that boost-histogram exists as a more streamlined library (that they might consider, for instance, in a headless workflow).

@eduardo-rodrigues
Copy link
Member Author

Exactly. Thanks, merging.

@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues merged commit d14e9dc into main Jul 23, 2024
3 checks passed
@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues deleted the eduardo-rodrigues-patch-1 branch July 23, 2024 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Histogram manipulations and fitting -> Boost histograms never used?
2 participants