Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-31981 Mutex code was inefficient #18756

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2024

Conversation

richardkchapman
Copy link
Member

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Cloud-compatibility
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

Copy link
Member

@ghalliday ghalliday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@richardkchapman looks good. Needs a bit of tidying up - commit message, squash and a few compile issues, but otherwise good to merge.

{
friend class Monitor;
protected:
Mutex(const char *name)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OldMutex - otherwise you get windows compile errors.

@@ -46,8 +47,9 @@ extern jlib_decl void spinUntilReady(std::atomic_uint &value);
#endif

#ifdef _WIN32
class jlib_decl Mutex
class jlib_decl OldMutex
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Legacy might be a better name than old, but doesn't really matter.


waiting--;
return ret;
}
Mutex mutex;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

trivial: newline before rather than after so that members are grouped together

private:
T &mutex;
public:
MutexBlock<T>(T &m) : mutex(m) { mutex.lock(); };
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the is not needed/correct on the constructor, and is causing compile errors for wasmembed

@richardkchapman richardkchapman changed the title Mutex refactor HPCC-31981 Mutex code was inefficient Jun 19, 2024
@richardkchapman richardkchapman marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2024 08:29
@richardkchapman
Copy link
Member Author

@ghalliday made changes as suggested, and squashed. Please re-review

Refactor Mutex class to use modern C++ standard mutexes,
which are significantly faster. Leave old Mutex class in place just
in case the unlockall functionality is significant in the one place
that uses it.

Also fixes Incorrect summary stats fromjlib timing test

Signed-off-by: Richard Chapman <[email protected]>
@ghalliday ghalliday merged commit be024c6 into hpcc-systems:master Jun 19, 2024
52 of 53 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants