Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-31504 Improve how ParquetWriter creates columns from ECL rows #18430

Merged

Conversation

jackdelv
Copy link
Contributor

@jackdelv jackdelv commented Mar 20, 2024

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Cloud-compatibility
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

@jackdelv jackdelv requested review from ghalliday and dcamper March 20, 2024 14:35
@jackdelv jackdelv marked this pull request as draft March 20, 2024 14:52
@jackdelv
Copy link
Contributor Author

After rebasing to 9.4.x it has conflicts with defines solved by JIRA HPCC-31301.

@ghalliday
Copy link
Member

I'm waiting for @dcamper to do a first review. Let me know if you would find it valuable for me to take a look first.

@jackdelv
Copy link
Contributor Author

jackdelv commented Apr 1, 2024

@ghalliday If you could take a look that would be great. Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@dcamper dcamper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice to see RapidJSON removed!

Copy link
Member

@ghalliday ghalliday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've scanned the changes and they look like a good improvement - anything that deletes 300 lines has got to be good! I didn't spot any problems.

@ghalliday
Copy link
Member

@jackdelv can you change this to a normal PR rather than a draft, and I will merge? Draft normally means it isn't considered ready for merging, and it has been opened for initial discussion review. Otherwise please open as non-draft.

@jackdelv jackdelv marked this pull request as ready for review April 10, 2024 11:55
@jackdelv
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ghalliday Changed to normal PR. Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@ghalliday ghalliday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jackdelv this is not currently building on some of the systems.
A short-term fix is to add
#undef BOOL
after the #includes

A better fix, which seems to work, is to delete the definition from platform.h (line 364).

@jackdelv
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ghalliday Doesn't this PR, #18310, already fix this, or is it easier to include the fix in this one?

@ghalliday
Copy link
Member

Well spotted. I will cherry-pick that back to 9.4.x and then rerun the tests.

@ghalliday ghalliday closed this Apr 11, 2024
@ghalliday ghalliday reopened this Apr 11, 2024
Copy link

Jira Issue: https://hpccsystems.atlassian.net//browse/HPCC-31504

Jirabot Action Result:
Workflow Transition: Merge Pending
Updated PR

@ghalliday ghalliday merged commit e8a2e88 into hpcc-systems:candidate-9.4.x Apr 11, 2024
77 of 82 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants