Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-30564 Prevent pending write externals being flushed from cache. #17953

Merged

Conversation

jakesmith
Copy link
Member

@jakesmith jakesmith commented Oct 25, 2023

Flushing some externals from the external cache (when full), whilst the transactions are still pending to written could cause subsequent ext. cache lookups to attempt to look to disk for the external, and fail with "Missing external file ".

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Cloud-compatibility
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

@jakesmith jakesmith force-pushed the HPCC-30564-extcache-fix branch 2 times, most recently from 75938dd to 3a3d94d Compare October 25, 2023 15:59
@jakesmith jakesmith marked this pull request as ready for review October 25, 2023 16:00
@jakesmith jakesmith requested a review from ghalliday October 25, 2023 16:00
@@ -1956,6 +1967,8 @@ class CExtCache
if (mapIt != extTable.end())
{
auto listIter = mapIt->second;
Linked<CTransactionItem> &existingItem = *listIter;
cachedSz -= existingItem->ext.dataLength;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ghalliday - I spotted this in some late testing. Basically it would mean that although the cache was low, the cachedSz was left high, resulting in repeated spurious premature attempts to purge the ext. cache. It would mean that the external cache was effectively a 1-element cache after running for some time.

Copy link
Member

@ghalliday ghalliday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One comment - will re-review tomorrow.

// pending on write.
unsigned extCacheSizeMB = config.getPropInt("@extCacheSizeMB", defaultExtCacheSizeMB);
unsigned deltaTransactionMaxMemMB = config.getPropInt("@deltaTransactionMaxMemMB", defaultDeltaMemMaxMB);
if (extCacheSizeMB && deltaTransactionMaxMemMB && (extCacheSizeMB < deltaTransactionMaxMemMB))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be <= rather than <?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, it should, I'll change and squash that minor change in.

Flushing some externals from the external cache (when full), whilst
the transactions are still pending to be written could cause
subsequent ext. cache lookups to attempt to look to disk for the
external, and fail with "Missing external file ".

Also fix a bug with cachedSz. Transactions that removed externals,
were being removed from the cache, but their size was not
deducted from cachedSz.
Consequently, over time, the extCache would falsely appear full,
meaning it was purged prematurely.

Signed-off-by: Jake Smith <[email protected]>
@jakesmith jakesmith force-pushed the HPCC-30564-extcache-fix branch from 3a3d94d to 588dccf Compare October 25, 2023 18:43
@jakesmith jakesmith requested a review from ghalliday October 25, 2023 18:47
@ghalliday ghalliday merged commit 71c7d51 into hpcc-systems:candidate-9.4.x Oct 26, 2023
49 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants